A systematic review of the prognostic value of texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET in lung cancer.
Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the prognostic value of texture parameters derived by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in patients with lung cancer.Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to March 12, 2018, for ori...
| Publicado en: | Annals of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 32; no. 9; pp. 602 - 611 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=132695299&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 132695299 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09147187 1CFC jtl: Annals of Nuclear Medicine issn: 09147187 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2018 vid: 32 iid: 9 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 132695299 132695299 NLM30014440 10.1007/s12149-018-1281-9 NLM30014440 132695299 ppf: 602 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: A systematic review of the prognostic value of texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET in lung cancer. aug: au: Han, Sangwon Woo, Sungmin Suh, Chong Hyun Kim, Yeon Joo Oh, Jungsu S. Lee, Jong Jin affil: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea sug: ab: Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the prognostic value of texture parameters derived by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in patients with lung cancer.Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to March 12, 2018, for original articles involving texture analysis for the prediction of prognosis in patients with lung cancer. Risk of bias in the studies was critically assessed using the QUIPS tool. The results of survival analysis in the included studies were compared.Results: Of the 446 articles retrieved, 17 studies were eligible for inclusion. Our review suggests that the prognostic value of texture parameters in lung cancer remains unproven. Most studies had a moderate to high risk of bias. Texture parameters that described prognosis were not replicated across studies. Conflicting results on hazard ratios were found among the studies. This discrepancy is partly explained by false-positive findings originating from statistical error and variability caused by different methodologies used for image acquisition and processing in the included studies.Conclusion: Based on currently available evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support the prognostic value of texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET in lung cancer. Further studies implementing well-established methodologies and statistical evidence are warranted for proper validation of these promising imaging biomarkers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|