Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study.

Aim. To evaluate, with three-dimensional analysis, the effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after maxillary molar extraction in reducing alveolar bone resorption and maxillary sinus pneumatization when compared to unassisted socket healing. Methods. Patients were included in the study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BioMed Research International pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Lombardi, Teresa, Bernardello, Fabio, Berton, Federico, Porrelli, Davide, Rapani, Antonio, Camurri Piloni, Alvise, Fiorillo, Luca, Di Lenarda, Roberto, Stacchi, Claudio
Formato: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 11/04/2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=132821935&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 132821935
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23146133
        FT2T
      jtl: BioMed Research International
      issn: 23146133
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 11/04/2018
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        132821935
        132821935
        132821935
        10.1155/2018/9352130
        132821935
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Lombardi, Teresa
          Bernardello, Fabio
          Berton, Federico
          Porrelli, Davide
          Rapani, Antonio
          Camurri Piloni, Alvise
          Fiorillo, Luca
          Di Lenarda, Roberto
          Stacchi, Claudio
        affil: Private Practice, Cassano allo Ionio (CS), Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Maxilla Surgery
          Molar Surgery
          Maxillary Sinus Pathology
          Tooth Extraction
          Alveolar Process
          Bone Resorption
          Human
          Multicenter Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Case Control Studies
          Nanostructures
          Hydroxyapatites
          Molar Radiography
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Postoperative Period
          Software
          T-Tests
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Treatment Outcomes
      ab: Aim. To evaluate, with three-dimensional analysis, the effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after maxillary molar extraction in reducing alveolar bone resorption and maxillary sinus pneumatization when compared to unassisted socket healing. Methods. Patients were included in the study following inclusion criteria and underwent minimally traumatic maxillary molar extraction followed by ARP using synthetic nanohydroxyapatite (Fisiograft Bone, Ghimas, Italy) (test group) or unassisted socket healing (control group). Cone-beam computerized tomographies (CBCT) were performed immediately after tooth extraction (T0) and 6 months postoperatively (T1). CBCTs were superimposed by using a specific software (Amira, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the following items were analyzed in both groups: (i) postextractive maxillary sinus floor expansion in coronal direction and (ii) postextractive alveolar bone dimensional changes (both vertical and horizontal). All data were tested for normality and equality of variance and subsequently analyzed by independent samples T-test and Mann–Whitney test. Results. Thirty patients were treated by three centers and twenty-six (test n=13; control n=13) were included in the final analysis. Mean sinus pneumatization at T1 was 0.69±0.48 mm in the test group and 1.04±0.67 mm in the control group (p=0.15). Mean vertical reduction of the alveolar bone at T1 was 1.62±0.49 mm in the test group and 2.01±0.84 mm in the control group (p=0.08). Mean horizontal resorption of crestal bone at T1 was 2.73±1.68 mm in test group and 3.63±2.24 mm in control group (p=0.24). Conclusions. It could be suggested that ARP performed after maxillary molar extraction may reduce the entity of sinus pneumatization and alveolar bone resorption, compared to unassisted socket healing. This technique could decrease the necessity of advanced regenerative procedures prior to dental implant placement in posterior maxilla.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N