Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with standard digital mammography (DM) workup views in the breast cancer assessment clinic.Materials and Methods: The Tomosynthesis Assessment Clinic trial (TACT), conducted between 16 October 2014 and 19 April 2016, is an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Radiology Vol. 28; no. 12; pp. 5182 - 5195
Main Authors: Mall, S., Noakes, J., Kossoff, M., Lee, W., McKessar, M., Goy, A., Duncombe, J., Roberts, M., Giuffre, B., Miller, A., Bhola, N., Kapoor, C., Shearman, C., DaCosta, G., Choi, S., Sterba, J., Kay, M., Bruderlin, K., Winarta, N., Donohue, K.
Format: diagnostic images research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2018
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=132880996&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 132880996
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2018
      vid: 28
      iid: 12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        132880996
        132880996
        NLM29846804
        132880996
        10.1007/s00330-018-5473-4
        NLM29846804
        132880996
      ppf: 5182
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
      aug:
        au:
          Mall, S.
          Noakes, J.
          Kossoff, M.
          Lee, W.
          McKessar, M.
          Goy, A.
          Duncombe, J.
          Roberts, M.
          Giuffre, B.
          Miller, A.
          Bhola, N.
          Kapoor, C.
          Shearman, C.
          DaCosta, G.
          Choi, S.
          Sterba, J.
          Kay, M.
          Bruderlin, K.
          Winarta, N.
          Donohue, K.
        affil: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Room M204, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Mammography Methods
          Radiographic Image Enhancement Methods
          Health Screening Methods
          Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
          ROC Curve
          Incidence
          Female
          Human
          Breast Neoplasms Epidemiology
          Australia
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Scales
          Female
      ab: Purpose: To compare the efficacy of use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with standard digital mammography (DM) workup views in the breast cancer assessment clinic.Materials and Methods: The Tomosynthesis Assessment Clinic trial (TACT), conducted between 16 October 2014 and 19 April 2016, is an ethics-approved, monocenter, multireader, multicase split-plot reading study. After written informed consent was obtained, 144 females (age > 40 years) who were recalled to the assessment clinic were recruited into TACT. These cases (48 cancers) were randomly allocated for blinded review of (1) DM workup and (2) DBT, both in conjunction with previous DM from the screening examination. Fifteen radiologists of varying experience levels in the Australia BreastScreen Program were included in this study, wherein each radiologist read 48 cases (16 cancers) in 3 non-overlapping blocks. Diagnostic accuracy was measured by means of sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). The receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine radiologists' performances.Results: Use of DBT (AUC = 0.927) led to improved performance of the radiologists (z = 2.62, p = 0.008) compared with mammography workup (AUC = 0.872). Similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DBT (0.93, 0.75, 0.64, 0.96) were higher than those of the workup (0.90, 0.56, 0.49, 0.92). Most radiologists (80%) performed better with DBT than standard workup. Cancerous lesions on DBT appeared more severe (U = 33,172, p = 0.02) and conspicuous (U = 24,207, p = 0.02). There was a significant reduction in the need for additional views (χ2 = 17.63, p < 0.001) and recommendations for ultrasound (χ2 = 8.56, p = 0.003) with DBT.Conclusions: DBT has the potential to increase diagnostic accuracy and simplify the assessment process in the breast cancer assessment clinic.Key Points: • Use of DBT in the assessment clinic results in increased diagnostic accuracy. • Use of DBT in the assessment clinic improves performance of radiologists and also increases the confidence in their decisions. • DBT may reduce the need for additional views, ultrasound imaging, and biopsy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N