Detailed analysis of the Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test using Arabic‐hiragana conversion.
Aim: The number‐transcoding task on the Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST‐J) requires conversion between Arabic and Chinese numerals (209 to 二百九, 4054 to 四千五十四, 六百八十一 to 681, 二千二十七 to 2027). In this task, questions and answers are written for Chinese‐Arabic conversion. We r...
| Publicado en: | Psychogeriatrics Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 446 - 451 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=132896264&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 132896264 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13463500 Q4N jtl: Psychogeriatrics issn: 13463500 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2018 vid: 18 iid: 6 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 132896264 132896264 132896264 10.1111/psyg.12356 132896264 ppf: 446 ppct: 5 formats: tig: atl: Detailed analysis of the Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test using Arabic‐hiragana conversion. aug: au: Moriyama, Yasushi Yoshino, Aihide Muramatsu, Taro Mimura, Masaru affil: Department of Psychiatry, Komagino Hospital, Tokyo Japan sug: subj: Dementia Diagnosis Coding Arabia Ethnology Chinese Persons Phonetics Human Scales Sensitivity and Specificity ab: Aim: The number‐transcoding task on the Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST‐J) requires conversion between Arabic and Chinese numerals (209 to 二百九, 4054 to 四千五十四, 六百八十一 to 681, 二千二十七 to 2027). In this task, questions and answers are written for Chinese‐Arabic conversion. We reported that the RDST‐J could distinguish subjects with Alzheimer's disease with a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score of 0.5 from controls. In this study, we investigated the impact of changing the task to a hiragana‐Arabic conversion. Methods: Participants consisted of 45 patients with a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score of 0.5 and 52 normal controls. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of total scores ≥9 on the two RDST‐J versions for discriminating subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score of 0.5 from controls were 73.1% and 75.5%, respectively, on the original version, and 71.8% and 73.0%, respectively, on the revised version. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of the revised version of the RDST‐J was equivalent to those of the original version. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|