Lessons from the Large Hadron Collider for model-based experimentation: the concept of a model of data acquisition and the scope of the hierarchy of models.

According to the hierarchy of models (HoM) account of scientific experimentation developed by Patrick Suppes and elaborated by Deborah Mayo, theoretical considerations about the phenomena of interest are involved in an experiment through theoretical models that in turn relate to experimental data th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese Vol. 195; no. 12; pp. 5431 - 5453
Main Author: Karaca, Koray
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=133123709&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 133123709
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2018
      vid: 195
      iid: 12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133123709
        10.1007/s11229-017-1453-5
      ppf: 5431
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 949KB
      tig:
        atl: Lessons from the Large Hadron Collider for model-based experimentation: the concept of a model of data acquisition and the scope of the hierarchy of models.
      aug:
        au: Karaca, Koray
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
      su:
        Large Hadron Collider
        Data acquisition systems
        Suppes, Patrick, 1922-2014
        Mayo, Deborah G.
        Particle physics
        Higgs bosons
      sug:
        subj:
          Large Hadron Collider
          Data acquisition systems
          Suppes, Patrick, 1922-2014
          Mayo, Deborah G.
          Particle physics
          Higgs bosons
      keyword:
        ATLAS experiment
        CERN
        Data selection
        Hierarchy of models
        Higgs boson
        Model of data acquisition
        Theory-ladenness
      ab: According to the hierarchy of models (HoM) account of scientific experimentation developed by Patrick Suppes and elaborated by Deborah Mayo, theoretical considerations about the phenomena of interest are involved in an experiment through theoretical models that in turn relate to experimental data through data models, via the linkage of experimental models. In this paper, I dispute the HoM account in the context of present-day high-energy physics (HEP) experiments. I argue that even though the HoM account aims to characterize experimentation as a model-based activity, it does not involve a modeling concept for the process of data acquisition, and it thus fails to provide a model-based characterization of the theory-experiment relationship underlying this process. In order to characterize the foregoing relationship, I propose the concept of a model of data acquisition and illustrate it in the case of the ATLAS experiment at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where the Higgs boson was discovered in 2012. I show that the process of data acquisition in the ATLAS experiment is performed according to a model of data acquisition that specifies and organizes the experimental procedures necessary to select the data according to a predetermined set of selection criteria. I also point out that this data acquisition model is theory-laden, in the sense that the underlying data selection criteria are determined by considering the testable predictions of the theoretical models that the ATLAS experiment is aimed to test. I take this sense of theory-ladenness to indicate that the relationship between the procedures of the ATLAS experiment and the theoretical models of the phenomena of interest is first established, prior to the formation of data models, through the data acquisition model of the experiment, thus not requiring the intermediary of other types of models as suggested by the HoM account. I therefore conclude that in the context of present-day HEP experiments, the HoM account does not consistently extend to the process of data acquisition so as to include models of data acquisition.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2018. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N