MAGNETS, MAGIC, AND OTHER ANOMALIES: IN DEFENSE OF METHODOLOGICAL NATURALISM.

Recent critiques of methodological naturalism (MN) claim that it fails by conflicting with Christian belief and being insufficiently humble. We defend MN by tracing the real history of the debate, contending that the story as it is usually told is mythic. We show how MN works in practice, including...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 1064 - 1094
Main Authors: Perry, John, Ritchie, Sarah Lane
Format: Article
Published: Open Library of Humanities Dec2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost