PROGRAM TEXT, PROGRAMMING STYLE, PROGRAMMER LABOR: Some Further Comments on Comments.
Computer programming can be understood as both a kind of writing and a special class of human labor activity facilitating the automation of other human labor activities, not excluding itself. From the very beginning of the history of computer programming, it was recognized that the technical logic o...
| Publicado en: | Cultural Politics (Duke University Press) Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 372 - 395 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Duke University Press
Nov2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=133219330&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 133219330 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17432197 EUIS jtl: Cultural Politics (Duke University Press) issn: 17432197 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2018 vid: 14 iid: 3 pid: 154 pub: Duke University Press artinfo: ui: 133219330 10.1215/17432197-7093380 ppf: 372 ppct: 23 formats: tig: atl: PROGRAM TEXT, PROGRAMMING STYLE, PROGRAMMER LABOR: Some Further Comments on Comments. aug: au: Lennon, Brian affil: Associate professor of English and comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University su: Computer programming Automation sug: subj: Other Computer Related Services Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development) Custom Computer Programming Services Computer programming Automation keyword: code computer programming natural language text code computer programming natural language text ab: Computer programming can be understood as both a kind of writing and a special class of human labor activity facilitating the automation of other human labor activities, not excluding itself. From the very beginning of the history of computer programming, it was recognized that the technical logic of programming is a logic of automation, indeed, a logic of self-automation or even recursive automation. This article suggests that a syntactic feature common to all programming languages used today serves as a register of this logic of automation, leaving traces in code that are legible if one knows where to look. That feature is the comment: natural-language text within a computer program that is written exclusively for human readers of the program and is separated from executable code, though it stands alongside it. At their most interesting, in patterns of use to which a managerial discourse of software craftspersonship is actively hostile, yet to which so-called literate programming practice is indifferent, program comments are traces of a mode of technical labor whose privilege and precarity both rest on its obscurity, an obscurity in no way resistant to reading. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|