Bounded Stories.
Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) and framing scholars share an interest in how the construction of policy arguments influences opinions and policy decisions. However, conceptual clarification is needed. This study advances the NPF by clarifying the meaning and function of frames and narrative, as we...
| Publicado en: | Policy Studies Journal Vol. 46; no. 4; pp. 922 - 949 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=133261586&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 133261586 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0190292X PSJ jtl: Policy Studies Journal issn: 0190292X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2018 vid: 46 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 133261586 10.1111/psj.12269 ppf: 922 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 295KB tig: atl: Bounded Stories. aug: au: Shanahan, Elizabeth A. Raile, Eric D. French, Kate A. McEvoy, Jamie su: Policy sciences Government policy Public opinion Agenda setting theory (Communication) Narratives Decision making in political science sug: subj: Policy sciences Government policy Public opinion Agenda setting theory (Communication) Narratives Decision making in political science keyword: flooding frames framing Narrative Policy Framework natural disaster risk Yellowstone flooding frames framing Narrative Policy Framework natural disaster risk Yellowstone ab: Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) and framing scholars share an interest in how the construction of policy arguments influences opinions and policy decisions. However, conceptual clarification is needed. This study advances the NPF by clarifying the meaning and function of frames and narrative, as well as their respective roles in creating policy realities. We explore sociological and psychological roots of framing scholarship and map these onto NPF's science of narratives philosophy, suggesting that narratives can reveal internally held cognitive schemas. We focus on issue categorization frames as boundaries for narrative construction. Within these bounds, narrative settings further focalize the audience by specifying where action toward a solution takes place. Based on 26 interviews with floodplain decision makers in Montana, we capture internally held cognitions through the assemblage of issue categorization frames and narrative elements. We find that settings can traverse issue categorization frames and policy solutions, with actions of characters that unfold within the setting being key. Similarly, we find that a single issue categorization frame can contain multiple different narratives and that individuals may simultaneously hold multiple different narratives internally. Overall, this study contributes to policy process research through establishment of connections among narratives, issue categorization frames, and cognitive schemas. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|