Reframing "participation" and "inclusion" in public health policy and practice to address health inequalities: Evidence from a major resident‐led neighbourhood improvement initiative.

There is a need for greater conceptual clarity in place‐based initiatives that seek to give residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods more control over action to address the social determinants of health inequalities at a local level. In this article, we address this issue as it relates to the conce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health & Social Care in the Community Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 199 - 207
Autores principales: Lewis, Susan, Bambra, Clare, Barnes, Amy, Collins, Michelle, Egan, Matt, Halliday, Emma, Orton, Lois, Ponsford, Ruth, Powell, Katie, Salway, Sarah, Townsend, Anne, Whitehead, Margaret, Popay, Jennie
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=133318687&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 133318687
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09660410
        EVX
      jtl: Health & Social Care in the Community
      issn: 09660410
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2019
      vid: 27
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133318687
        133318687
        133318687
        10.1111/hsc.12640
        133318687
      ppf: 199
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reframing "participation" and "inclusion" in public health policy and practice to address health inequalities: Evidence from a major resident‐led neighbourhood improvement initiative.
      aug:
        au:
          Lewis, Susan
          Bambra, Clare
          Barnes, Amy
          Collins, Michelle
          Egan, Matt
          Halliday, Emma
          Orton, Lois
          Ponsford, Ruth
          Powell, Katie
          Salway, Sarah
          Townsend, Anne
          Whitehead, Margaret
          Popay, Jennie
        affil: Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Social Participation
          Social Inclusion
          Public Health
          Health Policy
          Health Status Disparities
          Residence Characteristics
          Quality Improvement
          Human
          Social Determinants of Health
          Qualitative Studies
          Prospective Studies
          United Kingdom
          Empowerment
          Community Programs
          Decision Making
          Funding Source
          Psychological Well-Being
          Health Care Delivery
      ab: There is a need for greater conceptual clarity in place‐based initiatives that seek to give residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods more control over action to address the social determinants of health inequalities at a local level. In this article, we address this issue as it relates to the concepts of participation and inclusion. We draw on qualitative data generated during the first phase of the Communities in Control Study, a longitudinal multisite independent evaluation of the impact of Big Local on the social determinants of health and health inequalities. Big Local is a resident‐led area improvement initiative in England, funded by the UK Big Lottery Fund. Initiatives focused on community empowerment are increasingly prominent in public health policy and practice globally. Approaches emphasise the promotion of greater control over decisions and action among individuals, groups, and communities, particularly those living in disadvantaged circumstances. However, when it comes to participation and inclusion in taking action and making decisions, the field is characterised by conceptual confusion. This risks undermining the impact of these initiatives. While participation and inclusion are necessary conditions for empowerment and collective control, they are not necessarily sufficient. Sufficiency requires attention to the breadth of participation (i.e., to inclusion) and to the depth of participation (i.e., the extent to which it is experienced as empowering and ultimately enables the exercise of collective control over decisions and actions). In observing how different Big Local resident‐led partnerships across England are tackling the day‐to‐day challenges of engaging with their communities, we reveal the potential for policy and practice of reframing, and therefore clarifying (to highlight the different roles they have) the concepts of participation and inclusion in terms of depth and breadth.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N