HUME'S SECOND THOUGHTS ON PERSONAL IDENTITY.
In this paper, I present an interpretation on how Hume can escape from his intellectual ordeal concerning personal identity in the Appendix of the Treatise. First of all, I present the source of Hume's despair to offer an interpretation on what would have truly bothered Hume in the Appendix, and I i...
| Published in: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 94; pp. 182 - 194 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Vilnius University
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=133357003&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 133357003 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 94 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 133357003 10.15388/Problemos.2018.0.0.12005 ppf: 182 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.2MB tig: atl: HUME'S SECOND THOUGHTS ON PERSONAL IDENTITY. aug: au: Sunny Yang affil: Minerva Liberal Art College Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Oedae-ro, Mohyeon 81, Choingu Yongin, Gyeonggi, 17035, Korea(South) su: Self Transactional interpretations (Quantum theory) Mental work Ordeal Explanation sug: subj: Self Transactional interpretations (Quantum theory) Mental work Ordeal Explanation keyword: connecting principles homunculi model Hume's inconsistency Hume's second thoughts Personal Identity asmens tapatumas homunkulų modelis Hume'o abejonės Hume'o nenuoseklumas jungiamieji principai ab: In this paper, I present an interpretation on how Hume can escape from his intellectual ordeal concerning personal identity in the Appendix of the Treatise. First of all, I present the source of Hume's despair to offer an interpretation on what would have truly bothered Hume in the Appendix, and I identify several lines of interpretation. Recently Jonathan Ellis has distinguished various ways of understanding Hume's predicament. Of the four groups of explanations that Ellis distinguishes, in this paper I elaborate on the three that Ellis does not sufficiently explicate, addressing some key issues that Ellis missed. Last, I offer an alternative reading of Hume's difficulty, based on Dennett's ideas on the matter, and make a suggestion about what Hume ought to have said about these problems. Šiame straipsnyje svarstoma, kaip Davidas Hume'as galėtų išvengti savo intelektinių kančių dėl asmens tapatumo Traktato Priede. Visų pirma, straipsnyje siekiama suprasti Hume'o nusivylimo, bandant Traktato Priede paaiškinti tai, kas jam iš tikrųjų rūpėjo, šaltinis, ir pasiūlomos kelios interpretacinės linijos. Neseniai Jonathanas Ellisas išskyrė keletą galimų Hume'o keblumų supratimo būdų. Šiame straipsnyje iš keturių Elliso išskirtų paaiškinimų grupių detaliai aptariami trys jo menkai eksplikuoti dalykai ir sprendžiami kai kurie svarbūs Elliso praleisti klausimai. Galiausiai pasiūlomas alternatyvus Hume'o sunkumo perskaitymas, grindžiamas Danielio Dennetto idėjomis šiuo klausimu, ir pateikiamas pasiūlymas dėl to, ką Hume'as būtų galėjęs pasakyti apie šias problemas. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|