Effects of a federal housing voucher experiment on adolescent binge drinking: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Aims: To test how a housing voucher generating residential mobility to lower‐poverty neighborhoods, compared with public housing controls, influenced adolescent binge drinking, and whether gender modified effects. Design A multi‐site household‐level three‐arm randomized trial of a housing interventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 114; no. 1; pp. 48 - 59
Autores principales: Osypuk, Theresa L., Joshi, Spruha, Schmidt, Nicole M., Glymour, M. Maria, Nelson, Toben F.
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=133481334&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 133481334
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2019
      vid: 114
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133481334
        133481334
        133481334
        10.1111/add.14379
        133481334
      ppf: 48
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Effects of a federal housing voucher experiment on adolescent binge drinking: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Osypuk, Theresa L.
          Joshi, Spruha
          Schmidt, Nicole M.
          Glymour, M. Maria
          Nelson, Toben F.
        affil: Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis MN, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Binge Drinking Therapy
          Poverty
          Public Housing
          Secondary Analysis
          Sex Factors
          United States
          Financial Support
          Counseling
          Prevalence
          Male
          Female
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Intention
          Treatment Outcomes
          Patient Compliance
          Adolescence
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Aims: To test how a housing voucher generating residential mobility to lower‐poverty neighborhoods, compared with public housing controls, influenced adolescent binge drinking, and whether gender modified effects. Design A multi‐site household‐level three‐arm randomized trial of a housing intervention executed 1994–98, evaluated 2001–02. Setting: Five US cities: Baltimore, MD; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA; and New York, NY. Participants: A total of 3537 adolescents in 4248 low‐income eligible families were randomized; 2829 adolescents were analyzed at the interim evaluation (1950 in treatment; 879 in the control group). Attrition bias was accounted for with a 3‐in‐10 oversampling of hard‐to‐reach participants (effective response rate: 89%). Interventions: The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) trial randomized volunteer low‐income families in public housing to receive (1) rental subsidies redeemable in neighborhoods with < 10% tract poverty plus housing counseling, (2) unrestricted Section 8 rental subsidies or (3) to remain in public housing. We pooled the subsidy ('treatment') groups because they were conceptually similar and there was no evidence of statistical differences between groups on binge drinking. Measurements Primary outcome: past month binge drinking (five or more drinks in one sitting). Findings Adolescent binge drinking prevalence was 3.9% for treatment and 3.2% for control. The intention‐to‐treat (ITT) main effect of subsidy treatment (versus control) on binge drinking was non‐significant, but treatment effects were different for girls and boys (treatment–gender interaction P = 0.002). MTO treatment reduced girls' binge drinking [odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24–0.96, P = 0.037], but increased boys' binge drinking (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.13–4.97, P = 0.023), compared with controls. Results were similar for secondary alcohol outcomes. Instrumental variable (IV) results adjusting for treatment compliance were comparable with ITT, but larger. Conclusions: A housing subsidy treatment that enables low‐income families to move from public to private housing appears to lessen girls' binge drinking but increases boys' binge drinking, compared with controls.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N