Classification of intellectual disability according to domains of adaptive functioning and between‐domains discrepancy in adults with epilepsy.

Background: In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition (DSM‐5), the diagnostic criteria of intellectual disability (ID) include three domains of adaptive deficits: the conceptual, social and practical. Substantial intra‐individual differences between domains can be co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 40 - 49
Autores principales: Ool, J. S., Snoeijen‐Schouwenaars, F. M., Tan, I. Y., Schelhaas, H. J., Aldenkamp, A. P., Hendriksen, J. G. M.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=133559408&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 133559408
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09642633
        EUL
      jtl: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
      issn: 09642633
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2019
      vid: 63
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133559408
        133559408
        133559408
        10.1111/jir.12556
        133559408
      ppf: 40
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Classification of intellectual disability according to domains of adaptive functioning and between‐domains discrepancy in adults with epilepsy.
      aug:
        au:
          Ool, J. S.
          Snoeijen‐Schouwenaars, F. M.
          Tan, I. Y.
          Schelhaas, H. J.
          Aldenkamp, A. P.
          Hendriksen, J. G. M.
        affil: Department of Residential Care, Kempenhaeghe Epilepsy Centre, Heeze The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Persons with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Intellectual Disability Classification
          Adaptation, Psychological Evaluation
          Epilepsy Diagnosis
          Human
          Middle Age
          Adult
          DSM
          Intelligence Tests
          Odds Ratio
          Severity of Illness
          Age of Onset
          Conceptual Framework
          Social Behavior
          Health Personnel
          Intellectual Disability Diagnosis
          Scales
          Health Knowledge
          Special Populations
          Epilepsy, Partial, Focal Diagnosis
          Epilepsy, Generalized Diagnosis
          Seizures Diagnosis
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Background: In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition (DSM‐5), the diagnostic criteria of intellectual disability (ID) include three domains of adaptive deficits: the conceptual, social and practical. Substantial intra‐individual differences between domains can be considered an ID domain discrepancy. Method: We explored the associations between ID domains, discrepancies and epilepsy in 189 adults (mean age = 47.9; SD = 15.6). Each DSM‐5 ID domain was assessed separately, using subscales of the Vineland II for the social and practical domains, and psychological instruments, including intelligence tests, for the conceptual domain. A set of standardised criteria is proposed to identify an ID domain discrepancy. Results: An ID domain discrepancy seemed to be present in about one‐third of subjects and was particularly present in subjects with moderate ID (53.4%). Impairment in the social domain was most often the reason for the discrepancy. The presence of a discrepancy was significantly related to a focal (localised) epilepsy type (OR = 2.3, P = .028) and a mixed seizure type (OR = 1.4, P = .009). Epilepsy characteristics that are indicative of a more severe and refractory epilepsy, including various seizure types, a high seizure frequency, a combined epilepsy type (both focal and generalised epilepsy) and an early age at onset, were significantly related to more severe impairments in conceptual, social and practical adaptive behaviour (all P values <.01). Conclusions: With a substantial proportion of the subjects who had both ID and epilepsy with an ID discrepancy, professionals should be aware of this and take all domains of ID into account when studying or working with this vulnerable population.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N