Neutral Spaces and Topological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology: Lessons from Some Landscapes and Mappings.
I consider recent uses of the notion of neutrality in evolutionary biology and ecology, questioning their relevance to the kind of explanation recently labeled 'topological explanation'. Focusing on fitness landscapes and genotype-phenotype maps, I explore the explanatory uses of neutral subspaces,...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 85; no. 5; pp. 969 - 984 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | I consider recent uses of the notion of neutrality in evolutionary biology and ecology, questioning their relevance to the kind of explanation recently labeled 'topological explanation'. Focusing on fitness landscapes and genotype-phenotype maps, I explore the explanatory uses of neutral subspaces, as modeled in two perspectives: hyperdimensional fitness landscapes and RNA sequence-structure maps. I argue that topological properties of such spaces account for features of evolutionary systems: respectively, capacity for adaptive evolution toward global optima and mutational robustness of genotypes. Thus many models appealing to "neutral" manifolds provide topological alternatives to hypothetical mechanisms. |
|---|