Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.

Background: There is a growing interest in delivering more personalised, risk-based breast cancer screening protocols. This requires population-level validation of practical models that can stratify women into breast cancer risk groups. Few studies have evaluated the Gail model (NCI Breast Cancer Ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Breast Cancer Research Vol. 20; no. 1
Autores principales: Nickson, Carolyn, Procopio, Pietro, Velentzis, Louiza S., Carr, Sarah, Devereux, Lisa, Mann, Gregory Bruce, James, Paul, Lee, Grant, Wellard, Cameron, Campbell, Ian
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 12/20/2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=133663802&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 133663802
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14655411
        8UYJ
      jtl: Breast Cancer Research
      issn: 14655411
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 12/20/2018
      vid: 20
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133663802
        133663802
        NLM30572910
        133663802
        10.1186/s13058-018-1084-x
        NLM30572910
        133663802
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.
      aug:
        au:
          Nickson, Carolyn
          Procopio, Pietro
          Velentzis, Louiza S.
          Carr, Sarah
          Devereux, Lisa
          Mann, Gregory Bruce
          James, Paul
          Lee, Grant
          Wellard, Cameron
          Campbell, Ian
        affil: Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3010, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Early Detection of Cancer Methods
          Models, Statistical
          Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Health Screening Methods
          Risk Factors
          Female
          United States
          Breast Neoplasms Prevention and Control
          Prognosis
          Patient Selection
          Aged
          Australia
          National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
          Middle Age
          Human
          Pharmacokinetics
          Prospective Studies
          Breast Neoplasms Epidemiology
          Risk Assessment Methods
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
      ab: Background: There is a growing interest in delivering more personalised, risk-based breast cancer screening protocols. This requires population-level validation of practical models that can stratify women into breast cancer risk groups. Few studies have evaluated the Gail model (NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool) in a population screening setting; we validated this tool in a large, screened population.Methods: We used data from 40,158 women aged 50-69 years (via the lifepool cohort) participating in Australia's BreastScreen programme. We investigated the association between Gail scores and future invasive breast cancer, comparing observed and expected outcomes by Gail score ranked groups. We also used machine learning to rank Gail model input variables by importance and then assessed the incremental benefit in risk prediction obtained by adding variables in order of diminishing importance.Results: Over a median of 4.3 years, the Gail model predicted 612 invasive breast cancers compared with 564 observed cancers (expected/observed (E/O) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.18). There was good agreement across decile groups of Gail scores (χ2 = 7.1, p = 0.6) although there was some overestimation of cancer risk in the top decile of our study group (E/O = 1.65, 95% CI 1.33-2.07). Women in the highest quintile (Q5) of Gail scores had a 2.28-fold increased risk of breast cancer (95% CI 1.73-3.02, p < 0.0001) compared with the lowest quintile (Q1). Compared with the median quintile, women in Q5 had a 34% increased risk (95% CI 1.06-1.70, p = 0.014) and those in Q1 had a 41% reduced risk (95% CI 0.44-0.79, p < 0.0001). Similar patterns were observed separately for women aged 50-59 and 60-69 years. The model's overall discrimination was modest (area under the curve (AUC) 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.61). A reduced Gail model excluding information on ethnicity and hyperplasia was comparable to the full Gail model in terms of correctly stratifying women into risk groups.Conclusions: This study confirms that the Gail model (or a reduced model excluding information on hyperplasia and ethnicity) can effectively stratify a screened population aged 50-69 years according to the risk of future invasive breast cancer. This information has the potential to enable more personalised, risk-based screening strategies that aim to improve the balance of the benefits and harms of screening.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N