Nine months a slave: when pregnancy is involuntary servitude to a foetus.

Recent globally compiled evidence suggests that one-quarter of pregnancies end in abortions. However, abortions remain illegal in many countries, resulting in unsafe practices. Debates have largely stalled with the pro-life, pro-choice epithets. To provide further arguments in support of legalising...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Reproductive Health Matters Vol. 26; no. 52; pp. 57 - 62
Autores principales: Allotey-Reidpath, Kiva Diamond, Allotey, Pascale, Reidpath, Daniel D
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=133674449&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 133674449
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09688080
        F0W
      jtl: Reproductive Health Matters
      issn: 09688080
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2018
      vid: 26
      iid: 52
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133674449
        10.1080/09688080.2018.1451173
        133674449
      ppf: 57
      ppct: 5
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Nine months a slave: when pregnancy is involuntary servitude to a foetus.
      aug:
        au:
          Allotey-Reidpath, Kiva Diamond
          Allotey, Pascale
          Reidpath, Daniel D
        affil: Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Abortion, Induced Legislation and Jurisprudence
          Women's Rights
          Health Services Accessibility
          Patient Safety
          International Relations
      ab: Recent globally compiled evidence suggests that one-quarter of pregnancies end in abortions. However, abortions remain illegal in many countries, resulting in unsafe practices. Debates have largely stalled with the pro-life, pro-choice epithets. To provide further arguments in support of legalising abortion services, we argue that the state cannot demand of a woman that she maintains an unwanted pregnancy because that demand places her in a state of involuntary servitude. Involuntary servitude would put states in breach of international human rights law (Article 8 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights). Furthermore, we argue that the fact that a life may be forfeit when a woman withdraws her service is no basis for enforcing the servitude. We draw on the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution as an example to extend the argument and highlight the need to test involuntary servitude in international human rights law through mechanisms offered in the international periodic review of member states. This could provide a robust approach to support and strengthen access to safe abortion services.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N