Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities.

Background: Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities is arguably more important than implementation science in resource-rich settings, because resource poverty requires novel solutions to ensure that research results are translated into routine practice and benefit the large...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Implementation Science Vol. 13; no. 1
Main Authors: Yapa, H. Manisha, Bärnighausen, Till
Format: research Journal Article
Published: BioMed Central 12/27/2018
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=133735224&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 133735224
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17485908
        38MN
      jtl: Implementation Science
      issn: 17485908
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 12/27/2018
      vid: 13
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        133735224
        133735224
        NLM30587195
        133735224
        10.1186/s13012-018-0847-1
        NLM30587195
        133735224
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities.
      aug:
        au:
          Yapa, H. Manisha
          Bärnighausen, Till
        affil: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Health Care Delivery Administration
          Diffusion of Innovation
          Health Policy
          Developing Countries
          Healthcare Disparities Statistics and Numerical Data
          Organizational Development Statistics and Numerical Data
          Research, Medical
          Health Resource Utilization Statistics and Numerical Data
          Human
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Ways of Coping Questionnaire
      ab: Background: Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities is arguably more important than implementation science in resource-rich settings, because resource poverty requires novel solutions to ensure that research results are translated into routine practice and benefit the largest possible number of people.Methods: We reviewed the role of resources in the extant implementation science frameworks and literature. We analyzed opportunities for implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities, as well as threats to the realization of these opportunities.Results: Many of the frameworks that provide theoretical guidance for implementation science view resources as contextual factors that are important to (i) predict the feasibility of implementation of research results in routine practice, (ii) explain implementation success and failure, (iii) adapt novel evidence-based practices to local constraints, and (iv) design the implementation process to account for local constraints. Implementation science for resource-poor settings shifts this view from "resources as context" to "resources as primary research object." We find a growing body of implementation research aiming to discover and test novel approaches to generate resources for the delivery of evidence-based practice in routine care, including approaches to create higher-skilled health workers-through tele-education and telemedicine, freeing up higher-skilled health workers-through task-shifting and new technologies and models of care, and increasing laboratory capacity through new technologies and the availability of medicines through supply chain innovations. In contrast, only few studies have investigated approaches to change the behavior and utilization of healthcare resources in resource-poor settings. We identify three specific opportunities for implementation science in resource-poor settings. First, intervention and methods innovations thrive under constraints. Second, reverse innovation transferring novel approaches from resource-poor to research-rich settings will gain in importance. Third, policy makers in resource-poor countries tend to be open for close collaboration with scientists in implementation research projects aimed at informing national and local policy.Conclusions: Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities offers important opportunities for future discoveries and reverse innovation. To harness this potential, funders need to strongly support research projects in resource-poor settings, as well as the training of the next generation of implementation scientists working on new ways to create healthcare resources where they lack most and to ensure that those resources are utilized to deliver care that is based on the latest research results.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N