Safety climate and safety outcomes: A meta-analytic comparison of universal vs. industry-specific safety climate predictive validity.
Previous research has demonstrated that safety climate is a robust predictor of safety-related outcomes. However, there is little consensus about the optimal strategy to measure safety climate. One of the main issues has been whether safety climate measures should be universal or industry-specific....
| Publicado en: | Work & Stress Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 41 - 58 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jan-Mar2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=134137189&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 134137189 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02678373 BE8 jtl: Work & Stress issn: 02678373 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan-Mar2019 vid: 33 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 134137189 134137189 134137189 10.1080/02678373.2018.1457737 134137189 ppf: 41 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Safety climate and safety outcomes: A meta-analytic comparison of universal vs. industry-specific safety climate predictive validity. aug: au: Jiang, Lixin Lavaysse, Lindsey M. Probst, Tahira M. affil: Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, USA sug: subj: Occupational Safety Organizational Culture Predictive Validity Criterion-Related Validity Human Meta Analysis Social Behavior Attitude to Risk Accidents, Occupational Occupational-Related Injuries Surveys Systematic Review ab: Previous research has demonstrated that safety climate is a robust predictor of safety-related outcomes. However, there is little consensus about the optimal strategy to measure safety climate. One of the main issues has been whether safety climate measures should be universal or industry-specific. As such, this study was designed to examine the criterion-related validity of universal and industry-specific safety climate measures by conducting a meta-analytic comparison of their relationships with a variety of safety-related outcomes (i.e. safety behaviour, risk perceptions, accidents and injuries, and other adverse events). With 120 independent samples (N = 81,213), we found that the industry-specific safety climate measures displayed better predictive power when predicting safety behaviour and risk perceptions than the universal safety climate measures. On the other hand, the universal safety climate measures displayed better predictive power when predicting other adverse events (but not accidents and injuries) than the industry-specific safety climate measures. We discuss these findings in light of the intended use of organisational safety climate surveys. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|