Marketplace Coverage and Limited Access to Care Among Employed Beneficiaries? Evidence From Ohio.
This article examines the initial effect of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Health Insurance Marketplace (Exchange) insurance on access to care among employed beneficiaries in a highly populated US state. Does Exchange insurance lead to better/worse health care access for employed beneficiaries, compared...
| Publicado en: | Health Services Insights Vol. 11; pp. 1 - 2 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=134163468&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 134163468 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 11786329 B10H jtl: Health Services Insights issn: 11786329 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 11 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 134163468 134163468 134163468 10.1177/1178632918790880 134163468 ppf: 1 ppct: 1 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Marketplace Coverage and Limited Access to Care Among Employed Beneficiaries? Evidence From Ohio. aug: au: Goldstein, Evan V. Cai, Jie Liu, Anqi affil: Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA sug: subj: Health Insurance Exchanges Ohio Insurance Coverage Health Services Accessibility Insurance Benefits Human Male Female Adolescence Adult Middle Age Aged Ohio Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Logistic Regression McNemar's Test Health Policy Data Analysis Software Odds Ratio Confidence Intervals Descriptive Statistics Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: This article examines the initial effect of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Health Insurance Marketplace (Exchange) insurance on access to care among employed beneficiaries in a highly populated US state. Does Exchange insurance lead to better/worse health care access for employed beneficiaries, compared with similar individuals covered through standard employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) coverage? This retrospective study uses data from the 2015 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey, a dual-frame and computer-assisted telephone survey administered by the Ohio Colleges of Medicine Graduate Resource Center, the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the Ohio Department of Health, and Ohio State University, in conjunction with RTI International. This study examines a sub-sample of employed adults (age 18-64) covered by either an Exchange plan or ESI, extracted from the full sample of n = 42 876. We use linear propensity score matching using Euclidean distance to balance treatment groups and logistic regression models to estimate the treatment effect of Exchange coverage on all outcome variables. McNemar tests, Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, and Benjamini-Hochberg procedure adjustments are also conducted. Compared with ESI insurance, Exchange insurance has no significant effect on outcomes measuring either perceived access to care or, more specifically, perceived financial barriers to accessing care. Exchange plan viability remains a hot topic of debate across the United States, given the potential repeal of the individual mandate. We use risk-adjustment methods to demonstrate that Exchange plan beneficiaries do not experience worse access to care than ESI beneficiaries. That said, several key limitations are discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|