The common rule's 'reasonable person' standard for informed consent.
Laura Odwazny and Benjamin Berkman have raised several challenges regarding the new reasonable person standard in the revised Common Rule, which states that informed consent requires potential research subjects be provided with information a reasonable person would want to know to make an informed d...
| Publicado en: | Bioethics Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 274 - 278 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Feb2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=134360160&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 134360160 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699702 6PJ jtl: Bioethics issn: 02699702 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2019 vid: 33 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 134360160 10.1111/bioe.12544 ppf: 274 ppct: 4 formats: tig: atl: The common rule's 'reasonable person' standard for informed consent. aug: au: Greenblum, Jake Hubbard, Ryan affil: University Health System, San Antonio Texas, United States Gulf Coast State College, Panama City Florida, United States su: Berkman, Benjamin Informed consent (Medical law) Human research subjects Reasonable person standard (Law) Institutional review boards sug: subj: Informed consent (Medical law) Human research subjects Reasonable person standard (Law) Institutional review boards Berkman, Benjamin keyword: bioethics Common Rule informed consent institutional review board reasonable person research subjects bioethics Common Rule informed consent institutional review board reasonable person research subjects ab: Laura Odwazny and Benjamin Berkman have raised several challenges regarding the new reasonable person standard in the revised Common Rule, which states that informed consent requires potential research subjects be provided with information a reasonable person would want to know to make an informed decision on whether to participate in a study. Our aim is to offer a response to the challenges Odwazny and Berkman raise, which include the need for a reasonable person standard that can be applied consistently across institutional review boards and that does not stigmatize marginal groups. In response, we argue that the standard ought to be based in an ordinary rather than ideal person conception of reasonable person and that the standard ought to employ what we call a liberal constraint: the reasonability standard must be malleable enough such that a wide variety of individuals with different, unique value systems would endorse it. We conclude by suggesting some of the likely consequences our view would have, if adopted. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|