Coproduction and health: Public and clinicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.

Background: Coproduction is an approach increasingly recognized across public services internationally. However, awareness of the term and the barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the NHS are not widely understood. This study examines clinician and public perceptions of coproduction wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 93 - 102
Autores principales: Holland‐Hart, Daniella M., Addis, Samia M., Edwards, Adrian, Kenkre, Joyce E., Wood, Fiona
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=134360279&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 134360279
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2019
      vid: 22
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        134360279
        134360279
        134360279
        10.1111/hex.12834
        134360279
      ppf: 93
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Coproduction and health: Public and clinicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.
      aug:
        au:
          Holland‐Hart, Daniella M.
          Addis, Samia M.
          Edwards, Adrian
          Kenkre, Joyce E.
          Wood, Fiona
        affil: Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Public Opinion
          Physician Attitudes
          Health Services Accessibility
          Health Care Delivery
          Collaboration
          Human
          Interviews
          Qualitative Studies Methods
          Focus Groups
          Motivation
          Models, Theoretical
          Wales
          National Health Programs
          Communities
          Communication
          Time Factors
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Purposive Sample
          Male
          Female
          Snowball Sample
          Audiorecording
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Health Literacy
          Empowerment
          Self-Efficacy
          Decision Making
          Support, Psychosocial
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Coproduction is an approach increasingly recognized across public services internationally. However, awareness of the term and the barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the NHS are not widely understood. This study examines clinician and public perceptions of coproduction within the context of the Prudent Healthcare initiative. Objectives: To provide insights into how coproduction is viewed by clinicians and the public and identify perceived barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Design: Using qualitative research methods, interviews were conducted with the public (n = 40) and clinicians (n = 40). Five focus groups were also conducted with the public (n = 45) and six focus groups with clinicians (n = 26). The COM‐B model was used to analyse the data; key domains include Capability, Opportunity and Motivation. Setting: This is an all‐Wales study, involving six Health Boards, an NHS trust and community and patient groups. Results: Key barriers relating to Capability include lack of awareness of the term coproduction and inadequate communication between clinicians and citizens. Opportunity‐centred barriers include service and time constraints. Conversely, facilitators included utilizing partnerships with community organizations. Motivation‐related barriers included preconceptions about patients' limitations to coproduce. Conclusions: There were broadly positive perceptions among participants regarding coproduction, despite initial unfamiliarity with the term. Despite study limitations including underrepresentation of employed public participants and junior doctors, our analysis may assist researchers and policymakers who are designing, implementing and evaluating interventions to promote coproduction.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N