The Credibility of Public and Private Signals: A Document-Based Approach.

Crisis bargaining literature has predominantly used formal and qualitative methods to debate the relative efficacy of actions, public words, and private words. These approaches have overlooked the reality that policymakers are bombarded with information and struggle to adduce actual signals from end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Political Science Review Vol. 113; no. 1; pp. 156 - 173
Autores principales: KATAGIRI, AZUSA, MIN, ERIC
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Feb2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=134449558&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 134449558
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00030554
        APR
      jtl: American Political Science Review
      issn: 00030554
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2019
      vid: 113
      iid: 1
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        134449558
        10.1017/S0003055418000643
      ppf: 156
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Credibility of Public and Private Signals: A Document-Based Approach.
      aug:
        au:
          KATAGIRI, AZUSA
          MIN, ERIC
        affil:
          Nanyang Technological University
          University of California, Los Angeles
      su:
        Truthfulness & falsehood
        Collective action
        Political communication
        Communication in international relations
        Diplomacy
        Elite (Social sciences)
        Public speaking
        Message processing (Telecommunication)
      sug:
        subj:
          Truthfulness & falsehood
          Collective action
          Political communication
          Communication in international relations
          Diplomacy
          Elite (Social sciences)
          Public speaking
          Message processing (Telecommunication)
      ab: Crisis bargaining literature has predominantly used formal and qualitative methods to debate the relative efficacy of actions, public words, and private words. These approaches have overlooked the reality that policymakers are bombarded with information and struggle to adduce actual signals from endless noise. Material actions are therefore more effective than any diplomatic communication in shaping elites' perceptions. Moreover, while ostensibly "costless," private messages provide a more precise communication channel than public and "costly" pronouncements. Over 18,000 declassified documents from the Berlin Crisis of 1958–63 reflecting private statements, public statements, and White House evaluations of Soviet resolve are digitized and processed using statistical learning techniques to assess these claims. The results indicate that material actions have greater influence on the White House than either public or private statements; that public statements are noisier than private statements; and that private statements have a larger effect on evaluations of resolve than public statements.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N