Measurement properties of the OARSI core set of performance-based measures for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study on reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in 90 hip osteo-arthritis patients.

Background and purpose — Improvement of physical function is one of the main treatment goals in severe hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. The Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) has identified a core set of performance-based tests to assess the construct physical function: 30-s chai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Acta Orthopaedica Vol. 90; no. 1; pp. 15 - 21
Autores principales: Tolk, Jaap J, Janssen, Rob P A, Prinsen, C (Sanna) A C, van der Steen, M (Marieke) C, Bierma Zeinstra, Sita M A, Reijman, Max
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden AB February2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=134473040&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 134473040
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17453674
        1BVL
      jtl: Acta Orthopaedica
      issn: 17453674
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February2019
      vid: 90
      iid: 1
      pid: 59195
      pub: Medical Journals Sweden AB
    artinfo:
      ui:
        134473040
        134473040
        134473040
        10.1080/17453674.2018.1539567
        134473040
      ppf: 15
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Measurement properties of the OARSI core set of performance-based measures for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study on reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in 90 hip osteo-arthritis patients.
      aug:
        au:
          Tolk, Jaap J
          Janssen, Rob P A
          Prinsen, C (Sanna) A C
          van der Steen, M (Marieke) C
          Bierma Zeinstra, Sita M A
          Reijman, Max
        affil: Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven;
      sug:
        subj:
          Osteoarthritis, Hip Surgery
          Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
          Physical Performance Evaluation
          Clinical Assessment Tools Evaluation
          Surgery Schedule
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Construct Validity
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Muscle Strength
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Scales
      ab: Background and purpose — Improvement of physical function is one of the main treatment goals in severe hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. The Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) has identified a core set of performance-based tests to assess the construct physical function: 30-s chair stand test (30-s CST), 4x10-meter fast-paced walk test (40 m FPWT), and a stair-climb test. Despite this recommendation, available evidence on the measurement properties is limited. We evaluated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of these performance-based measures in patients with hip OA scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients and methods — Baseline and 12-month follow-up measurements were prospectively obtained in 90 end-stage hip OA patients who underwent THA. As there is no gold standard for comparison, the hypothesis testing method was used for construct validity and responsiveness analysis. A test can be assumed valid if ≥75% of predefined hypotheses are confirmed. A subgroup (n = 30) underwent test-retest measurements for reliability analysis. The Oxford Hip Score, Hip injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Physical Function Short Form, pain during activity score, and muscle strength were used as comparator instruments. Results — Test-retest reliability was appropriate; intraclass correlation coefficient values exceeded 0.70 for all 3 tests. None of the performance-based measures reached 75% hypothesis confirmation for the construct validity or responsiveness analysis. Interpretation — The performance-based tests have good reliability in the assessment of physical function. Construct validity and responsiveness, using patient-reported measures and muscle strength as comparator instruments, could not be confirmed. Therefore, our findings do not justify their use for clinical practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N