The U.S. Government's framing of corruption: a content analysis of public integrity section reports, 1978-2013.
Political corruption is a complicated issue, with pundits, scholars, and armchair theorists speculating on what makes politics so seemingly corrupt. The US agency tasked with investigating and correcting this corruption is the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Public Integrity Section (PIN). However, to...
| Published in: | Crime, Law & Social Change Vol. 71; no. 1; pp. 47 - 66 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Feb2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=134610952&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 134610952 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09254994 CRG jtl: Crime, Law & Social Change issn: 09254994 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2019 vid: 71 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 134610952 10.1007/s10611-018-9788-5 ppf: 47 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 493KB tig: atl: The U.S. Government's framing of corruption: a content analysis of public integrity section reports, 1978-2013. aug: au: Ceresola, Ryan G. affil: Department of Sociology, Hartwick College, 1 Hartwick Drive, Golisano 338, 13820, Oneonta, NY, USA su: United States United States. Dept. of Justice. Public Integrity Section Political corruption Social change Public administration Misconduct in public office Content analysis sug: subj: Political corruption Social change Public administration Misconduct in public office Content analysis United States United States. Dept. of Justice. Public Integrity Section Other General Government Support ab: Political corruption is a complicated issue, with pundits, scholars, and armchair theorists speculating on what makes politics so seemingly corrupt. The US agency tasked with investigating and correcting this corruption is the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Public Integrity Section (PIN). However, to date, there is no analysis of how corruption is interpreted and framed by this important government agency. Using a constructionist framework, a content analysis of thirty-five years of annual PIN reports to Congress is undertaken, demonstrating: 1) the PIN never explicitly defines what corruption is; 2) the PIN pays particular attention to the most dramatic cases of corruption (as opposed to the more mundane, typical cases) and emphasizes private businesses and individual malfeasance as exemplars of corruption. Finally, 3) the PIN has recently stopped briefly detailing each case they worked on in a year, and instead only present major highlights. In conclusion, the PIN frames corruption in a way that limits the ability for meaningful social change to occur at an institutional level. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|