Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in Cytopathology Studies: Review of 6 Journals.

Background The misuse of statistical methods in diagnostic accuracy studies has been criticized in many publications. Objective To assess the use and misuse of statistical methods in medical journal articles. Methods We reviewed 141 original articles from 6 cytopathology journals published in 2014....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Laboratory Medicine Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 8 - 16
Autores principales: Bahar, Burak, Pambuccian, Stefan E, Barkan, Güliz A, Akdaş, Yasemin
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA 2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Background The misuse of statistical methods in diagnostic accuracy studies has been criticized in many publications. Objective To assess the use and misuse of statistical methods in medical journal articles. Methods We reviewed 141 original articles from 6 cytopathology journals published in 2014. Results In total, 16 articles used no descriptive statistics and 66 articles used no inferential statistics. Also, 82 articles did not report using any tests for diagnostic accuracy. The most commonly adopted statistical measure for diagnostic accuracy was sensitivity, followed by specificity. The most common inferential statistical methods were χ2 testing, the Fisher exact test, and the Cohen kappa coefficient, respectively. Only 78 articles were free of statistical errors. "No statistics were used although statistical methods were required" was the most common type of error, followed by "failure to select proper statistical methods." Conclusion Our assessment of use of statistical methods in this subsection of pathology demonstrated a need for improvement.