Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum.
Background: Many public health programs fail because of an inability to implement tested interventions in diverse, complex settings. The field of implementation science is engaged in developing strategies for successful implementation, but current training is primarily researcher-focused. To tackle...
| Publicado en: | Implementation Science Vol. 14; no. 1 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2/28/2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=134989522&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 134989522 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17485908 38MN jtl: Implementation Science issn: 17485908 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2/28/2019 vid: 14 iid: 1 pid: 24147 pub: BioMed Central artinfo: ui: 134989522 134989522 NLM30819223 10.1186/s13012-019-0866-6 NLM30819223 134989522 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum. aug: au: Ramaswamy, Rohit Mosnier, Joe Reed, Kristin Powell, Byron J. Schenck, Anna P. affil: Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA sug: subj: Public Health Education Organizational Development Education, Graduate Professional Competence Standards Schools, Medical Curriculum North Carolina Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index Impact of Events Scale Scales Social Readjustment Rating Scale ab: Background: Many public health programs fail because of an inability to implement tested interventions in diverse, complex settings. The field of implementation science is engaged in developing strategies for successful implementation, but current training is primarily researcher-focused. To tackle the challenges of the twenty-first century, public health leaders are promoting a new model titled Public Health 3.0 where public health practitioners become "chief health strategists" and develop interdisciplinary skills for multisector engagement to achieve impact. This requires broad training for public health practitioners in implementation science that includes the allied fields of systems and design thinking, quality improvement, and innovative evaluation methods. At UNC Chapel Hill's Gillings School of Global Public Health, we created an interdisciplinary set of courses in applied implementation science for Master of Public Health (MPH) students and public health practitioners. We describe our rationale, conceptual approach, pedagogy, courses, and initial results to assist other schools contemplating similar programs.Methods: Our conceptual approach recognized the vital relationship between implementation research and practice. We conducted a literature review of thought leaders in public health to identify skill areas related to implementation science that are priorities for the future workforce. We also reviewed currently available training programs in implementation science to understand their scope and objectives and to assess whether any of these would be a fit for these priorities. We used a design focused implementation framework to create four linked courses drawing from multiple fields such as engineering, management, and the social sciences and emphasizing application through case studies. We validated the course content by mapping them to implementation science competencies in the literature.Results: To date, there is no other program that provides comprehensive interdisciplinary skills in applied implementation science for MPH students. As of April 2018, we have offered a total of eleven sections of the four courses, with a total enrollment of 142, of whom 127 have been master's-level students in the school of public health. Using Kirkpatrick's Model, we found positive student reaction, learning, and behavior. Many students have completed applied implementation science focused practicums, master's papers, and special studies.Conclusions: A systematically designed interdisciplinary curriculum in applied implementation science for MPH students has been found by students to be a useful set of skills. Students have demonstrated the capability to master this material and incorporate it into their practicums and master's papers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|