| Summary: | Purpose: To investigate the association of hypoenhancement on dynamic Contrast enhanced (DCE) with prostate cancer patient outcomes.Material and methods: This was a single-institution retrospective Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved cohort study of 54 men who had prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) within 6 months of cancer diagnosis between 01/2012 to 03/2014. Two readers independently identified the dominant MRI-lesions utilizing Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System-version2- guidelines. These lesions were classified as hypoenhancing or hyperenhancing, compared to normal peripheral zone using quantitative DCE analysis. The t test for unequal sample sizes and the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare groups. Logistic regression determined if DCE characteristics predict the development of metastases or prostate cancer death.Results: Time-to-progression was significantly shorter for hypoenhancing tumors (6.2 vs. 24.8 months, p = 0.05). Men with these lesions had a higher odds of having poor outcome (univariate logistic regression, odds ratio (OR) 6.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-31.72, p = 0.02; multivariate analysis, OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.30-13.72, p = 0.47). Hypoenhancing tumors were larger (33.1 vs. 19.1 mm, p < 0.001) and more likely to be intermediate (Gleason scores 3 + 4 and 4 + 3) and high-grade (Gleason scores ≥ 4 + 4) prostate cancers (p = 0.05). Men in the hypoenhancing group had a higher mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value (87.6 vs. 24.8 ng/dL, p = 0.01) and PSA density (1.54 vs. 0.72, p = 0.03). The mean Ktrans and kep of hypoenhancing lesion were lower when compared to hyperenhancing lesions (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04). Ve values did not differ (p = 0.25).Conclusion: Men with hypoenhancing prostate cancers may have a worse prognosis than men with hyperenhancing tumors.
|
|---|