Statistical Evidence, Assertions and Responsibility.

The legal system has been ambivalent about naked statistical evidence. Addressing this ambivalence, the article explores the epistemological status of naked statistical evidence and its normative and practical implications. It is suggested that since naked statistical evidence cannot generate knowle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 82; no. 2; pp. 269 - 293
Autor principal: Levanon, Liat
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=135078293&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 135078293
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2019
      vid: 82
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        135078293
        10.1111/1468-2230.12404
      ppf: 269
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 187KB
      tig:
        atl: Statistical Evidence, Assertions and Responsibility.
      aug:
        au: Levanon, Liat
      su:
        Statistical evidence (Law)
        Assertions (Logic)
        Responsibility
        Law & fact
        Justice administration
        Judicial error
        Judicial process
      sug:
        subj:
          Statistical evidence (Law)
          Assertions (Logic)
          Responsibility
          Law & fact
          Justice administration
          Judicial error
          Judicial process
      ab: The legal system has been ambivalent about naked statistical evidence. Addressing this ambivalence, the article explores the epistemological status of naked statistical evidence and its normative and practical implications. It is suggested that since naked statistical evidence cannot generate knowledge, it cannot be the basis for assertions of facts; and assertions of facts are practically and legally important: they are essential in order to establish the court's responsibility for its decisions and its errors. Such responsibility is needed in order to maintain the legitimacy of the legal system; to avoid unfairness to defendants; and to ensure that legal decision‐makers have no valid claims against the decision‐making arrangement. As a result, the legal system is inclined to avoid statistical evidence altogether.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N