Sex, Gender, and Class in the Poem of Parmenides: Difference without Dualism?

Abstract Parmenides has been criticized as denying and disparaging human diversity; anathematizing sex, reproduction, and bodies; supporting the suppression of women and others outside the Greek ruling classes; and silencing important concerns by excluding certain kinds of thought and reasoning from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Philology Vol. 140; no. 1; pp. 29 - 67
Autor principal: Cherubin, Rose
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Johns Hopkins University Press Spring2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=135258816&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 135258816
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00029475
        APL
      jtl: American Journal of Philology
      issn: 00029475
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2019
      vid: 140
      iid: 1
      pid: 226
      pub: Johns Hopkins University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        135258816
        10.1353/ajp.2019.0002
      ppf: 29
      ppct: 38
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Sex, Gender, and Class in the Poem of Parmenides: Difference without Dualism?
      aug:
        au: Cherubin, Rose
      su:
        Dualism
        Discourse
        Human sexuality
        Human reproduction
        Ancient philosophers
      sug:
        subj:
          Dualism
          Discourse
          Human sexuality
          Human reproduction
          Ancient philosophers
      ab: Abstract Parmenides has been criticized as denying and disparaging human diversity; anathematizing sex, reproduction, and bodies; supporting the suppression of women and others outside the Greek ruling classes; and silencing important concerns by excluding certain kinds of thought and reasoning from philosophical and civil discourse. I argue that the fragments do not support these charges, and that instead Parmenides provides ideas and ways of thinking that subvert the kinds of doctrine and ways of philosophizing he is accused of promoting.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N