Can the artificial intelligence technique of reinforcement learning use continuously-monitored digital data to optimize treatment for weight loss?

Behavioral weight loss (WL) trials show that, on average, participants regain lost weight unless provided long-term, intensive—and thus costly—intervention. Optimization solutions have shown mixed success. The artificial intelligence principle of "reinforcement learning" (RL) offers a new and more s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Behavioral Medicine Vol. 42; no. 2; pp. 276 - 291
Autores principales: Forman, Evan M., Kerrigan, Stephanie G., Butryn, Meghan L., Juarascio, Adrienne S., Manasse, Stephanie M., Ontañón, Santiago, Dallal, Diane H., Crochiere, Rebecca J., Moskow, Danielle
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=135694332&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 135694332
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01607715
        JBM
      jtl: Journal of Behavioral Medicine
      issn: 01607715
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2019
      vid: 42
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        135694332
        135694332
        135694332
        10.1007/s10865-018-9964-1
        135694332
      ppf: 276
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Can the artificial intelligence technique of reinforcement learning use continuously-monitored digital data to optimize treatment for weight loss?
      aug:
        au:
          Forman, Evan M.
          Kerrigan, Stephanie G.
          Butryn, Meghan L.
          Juarascio, Adrienne S.
          Manasse, Stephanie M.
          Ontañón, Santiago
          Dallal, Diane H.
          Crochiere, Rebecca J.
          Moskow, Danielle
        affil: Department of Psychology, WELL Center, Drexel University, Stratton Hall, 3141 Chestnut Street, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Weight Loss Therapy
          Reinforcement (Psychology)
          Learning
          Artificial Intelligence Utilization
          Monitoring, Physiologic
          Behavior Therapy Methods
          Treatment Outcomes Economics
          Human
          Pilot Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Remote Consultation Methods
          Algorithms
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Behavioral weight loss (WL) trials show that, on average, participants regain lost weight unless provided long-term, intensive—and thus costly—intervention. Optimization solutions have shown mixed success. The artificial intelligence principle of "reinforcement learning" (RL) offers a new and more sophisticated form of optimization in which the intensity of each individual's intervention is continuously adjusted depending on patterns of response. In this pilot, we evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a RL-based WL intervention, and whether optimization would achieve equivalent benefit at a reduced cost compared to a non-optimized intensive intervention. Participants (n = 52) completed a 1-month, group-based in-person behavioral WL intervention and then (in Phase II) were randomly assigned to receive 3 months of twice-weekly remote interventions that were non-optimized (NO; 10-min phone calls) or optimized (a combination of phone calls, text exchanges, and automated messages selected by an algorithm). The Individually-Optimized (IO) and Group-Optimized (GO) algorithms selected interventions based on past performance of each intervention for each participant, and for each group member that fit into a fixed amount of time (e.g., 1 h), respectively. Results indicated that the system was feasible to deploy and acceptable to participants and coaches. As hypothesized, we were able to achieve equivalent Phase II weight losses (NO = 4.42%, IO = 4.56%, GO = 4.39%) at roughly one-third the cost (1.73 and 1.77 coaching hours/participant for IO and GO, versus 4.38 for NO), indicating strong promise for a RL system approach to weight loss and maintenance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N