Why So Low?
Empirical evidence indicates that women philosophers tend to submit their work to journals substantially less often than their male colleagues. This paper points out that this difference in submission behavior comes with other specific aspects of women philosophers' behavior, such as a tendency to b...
| Publicado en: | Metaphilosophy Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 231 - 250 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=135744200&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 135744200 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00261068 9OM jtl: Metaphilosophy issn: 00261068 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2019 vid: 50 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 135744200 10.1111/meta.12353 ppf: 231 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 122KB tig: atl: Why So Low? aug: au: Leuschner, Anna affil: Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Philosophy, DFG RTG 2073 "Integrating Ethics and Epistemology of Scientific Research", Im Moore 21, 30167, Hannover Germany su: Women philosophers Social groups STEM education Philosophical research College curriculum sug: subj: Women philosophers Social groups STEM education Philosophical research College curriculum keyword: gender bias in academic publishing gender bias in philosophy gender bias in science philosophy journals' acceptance rates philosophy journals' submission rates stereotype threat women in philosophy women in science ab: Empirical evidence indicates that women philosophers tend to submit their work to journals substantially less often than their male colleagues. This paper points out that this difference in submission behavior comes with other specific aspects of women philosophers' behavior, such as a tendency to be reluctant to participate in discussions, to be willing to do work low in prestige, and to specialize in certain research topics, and it argues that these differences can be understood as indirect effects of social biases: namely, effects on the working behavior of members of targeted social groups. Recent findings from philosophy journals' book review sections and from other academic disciplines known to suffer from gender problems, especially from STEM disciplines, lend additional weight to this hypothesis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Metaphilosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|