The Georgia State Litigation: Literal Copying in Education.
This case note examines the long‐standing litigation against Georgia State University in relation to the posting, by faculty and library staff, of unauthorised copies of book extracts on the University's electronic reserves and virtual learning environment. The central question in this litigation ha...
| Publicado en: | Modern Law Review Vol. 82; no. 3; pp. 508 - 525 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
May2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=135821085&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 135821085 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267961 D8H jtl: Modern Law Review issn: 00267961 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2019 vid: 82 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 135821085 10.1111/1468-2230.12416 ppf: 508 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 149KB tig: atl: The Georgia State Litigation: Literal Copying in Education. aug: au: Hudson, Emily su: Georgia State University Actions & defenses (Law) Courseware Copyright Electronic reserve collections in libraries Copyright lawsuits Copyright licenses Appellate courts Library laws sug: subj: Georgia State University Actions & defenses (Law) Courseware Copyright Electronic reserve collections in libraries Copyright lawsuits Copyright licenses Appellate courts Library laws ab: This case note examines the long‐standing litigation against Georgia State University in relation to the posting, by faculty and library staff, of unauthorised copies of book extracts on the University's electronic reserves and virtual learning environment. The central question in this litigation has been whether these acts of copying fall within the fair use doctrine in US copyright law. In answering this, a key question for the US courts – and one relevant to other jurisdictions with free exceptions for education, such as the UK – has been whether existing and potential licensing activity is relevant to the question of whether an exception applies. This case note discusses how market effect has been analysed in Georgia State, including the recent rejection by the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit of a strongly empirical approach to market harm. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Modern Law Review holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|