THE LIMITS OF DETERMINACY IN ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT.

Predictability is also partly a testable hypothesis and findings of many studies clearly attest to the predictability of human interaction. Sociology clearly has a subject matter which is amenable to scientific study. The purpose of the paper is to analyze a subtle but fundamental noninstrument sour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Forces Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 295 - 301
Autores principales: DeFleur, Melvin L., Catton, William R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA May57
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=13592956&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 13592956
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00377732
        SFR
      jtl: Social Forces
      issn: 00377732
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May57
      vid: 35
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        13592956
        10.2307/2573316
      ppf: 295
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: THE LIMITS OF DETERMINACY IN ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT.
      aug:
        au:
          DeFleur, Melvin L.
          Catton, William R.
        affil:
          Indiana University
          University of North Carolina
      su:
        Social interaction
        Prediction (Psychology)
        Social exchange
        Statistical reliability
        Sociology
        Estimation theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Social interaction
          Prediction (Psychology)
          Social exchange
          Statistical reliability
          Sociology
          Estimation theory
      ab: Predictability is also partly a testable hypothesis and findings of many studies clearly attest to the predictability of human interaction. Sociology clearly has a subject matter which is amenable to scientific study. The purpose of the paper is to analyze a subtle but fundamental noninstrument source of indeterminacy in attitude measurement and to consider some of its implications. The data for all sciences consists of human responses to environmental events. The general procedure for minimizing indeterminacy in measurement due to the limited discriminal capacities of the human as a researcher is to have independent observers check on each other's findings. The precision of measurement is being operationally defined in an unfamiliar sense. It ordinarily denotes something like sampling error, the items in the scale are regarded as a sample of all possible items in a given attitude domain. The accuracy of best estimate is increased by increasing the number of items in the scale, thus increasing the number of endorsements.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1957
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N