The Philosophical Mea Culpa of the Icons of the Death of the Author.
We will hereinafter discuss the author's philosophy on gnoseological and historical premises. More precisely, by exploring the genealogy of the idea of the "Death of the Author" from modernism to postmodernism, we will analyse the concepts and ideologies that have become the stratagem of the denial...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 95; pp. 105 - 117 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=136144520&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 136144520 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2019 vid: 95 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 136144520 10.15388/Problemos.95.9 ppf: 105 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.6MB tig: atl: The Philosophical Mea Culpa of the Icons of the Death of the Author. aug: au: Krasniqi, Nysret affil: Department of Literature, Faculty of Philology, University of Prishtina su: Philosophy Philosophers Genealogy Theory of knowledge Symbolism sug: subj: Philosophy Philosophers Genealogy Theory of knowledge Symbolism keyword: autoriaus mirtis classic literature identity klasikinė literatūra literatūros filosofija literatūros mokymas philosophy of literature tapatybė teaching of literature the Death of the Author autoriaus mirtis klasikinė literatūra literatūros filosofija literatūros mokymas tapatybė ab: We will hereinafter discuss the author's philosophy on gnoseological and historical premises. More precisely, by exploring the genealogy of the idea of the "Death of the Author" from modernism to postmodernism, we will analyse the concepts and ideologies that have become the stratagem of the denial of western literary canon, as well as the denial of equilibrium between philosophical and literary identity and universality. By treating the works of philosophers, authors, and fundamental semiologists who perpetuated the idea of the Death of the Author, we will observe how the latter gradually fled from the philosophy of doubt and as mea culpa admitted that without the author's authority the philosophical and literary legacy is no longer the theatre of memory, but the abyss of oblivion. Moreover, with fundamental examples, we will observe the influence of this philosophy in the process of studying of the literature. Straipsnyje aptariamos autoriaus filosofijos gnoseologinės ir istorinės prielaidos. Tiksliau, aptarę „autoriaus mirties" idėjos genealogiją nuo modernizmo iki postmodernizmo, analizuojame sąvokas ir ideologijas, kurios tapo strategemomis neigiant Vakarų literatūros kanoną, griaunant pusiausvyrą tarp filosofinės ir literatūrinės tapatybės bei universalumo. Nagrinėdami filosofų, autorių ir pagrindinių semiologų darbus, palaikiusius autoriaus mirties idėją, parodome, kaip ši palaipsniui išnyko iš abejonių filosofijos ir kaip mea culpa pripažino, kad be autoriaus autoriteto filosofinis ir literatūrinis palikimas liaujasi būti atminties teatru ir virsta užmaršties bedugne. Straipsnyje pasitelkdami fundamentalius pavyzdžius parodome šios filosofijos įtaką literatūros studijų procesui. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|