Kinesthesia: An extended critical overview and a beginning phenomenology of learning.
This paper takes five different perspectives on kinesthesia, beginning with its evolution across animate life and its biological distinction from, and relationship to proprioception. It proceeds to document the historical derivation of "the muscle sense," showing in the process how analytic philosop...
| Publicado en: | Continental Philosophy Review Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 143 - 170 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=136223909&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 136223909 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13872842 OEF jtl: Continental Philosophy Review issn: 13872842 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2019 vid: 52 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 136223909 10.1007/s11007-018-09460-7 ppf: 143 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 714KB tig: atl: Kinesthesia: An extended critical overview and a beginning phenomenology of learning. aug: au: Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Oregon, 97403-1295, Eugene, OR, USA su: Muscular sense Phenomenology Proprioception Philosophers Infants sug: subj: Muscular sense Phenomenology Proprioception Philosophers Infants keyword: "Muscle sense" Adultist perspective Animate realities Evolutionary considerations Husserl's insights Mutual validation Phenomenological methodology Qualitative dynamics ab: This paper takes five different perspectives on kinesthesia, beginning with its evolution across animate life and its biological distinction from, and relationship to proprioception. It proceeds to document the historical derivation of "the muscle sense," showing in the process how analytic philosophers bypass the import of kinesthesia by way of "enaction," for example, and by redefinitions of "tactical deception." The article then gives prominence to a further occlusion of kinesthesia and its subduction by proprioception, these practices being those of well-known phenomenologists, practices that exemplify an adultist perspective supported in large part by the writings of Merleau-Ponty. Following this extended critical review, the article shows how Husserl's phenomenology enlightens us about kinesthesia and in doing so offers us substantive clues to the phenomenology of learning as it takes place in the development and acquisition of skillful movement. It shows further how phenomenological methodology contrasts markedly with existential analysis, most significantly in its recognition of, and its ability to set forth a developmental history, a veritable genetic phenomenology that is basically a phenomenology of learning anchored in kinesthesia. After showing how that phenomenology of learning finds mutual validation in a classic empirical study of infant movement, the article ends by highlighting how human "I cans" are grounded in "I move," specifically, in the pan-human ability to learn one's body and learn to move oneself. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Continental Philosophy Review is a copyright of Springer, 2019. All Rights Reserved. item: Continental Philosophy Review holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|