Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
The primary and convergent retrieval (PCR) model assumes that the act of successful recall not only boosts associations between the item and retrieval cues but additionally strengthens associations within the item (i.e., between the features of an item), speeding the rate of information retrieval fr...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 816 - 842 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
May2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=136445174&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 136445174 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2019 vid: 47 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 136445174 10.3758/s13421-019-00903-x ppf: 816 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.9MB tig: atl: Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. aug: au: Hopper, William J. Huber, David E. affil: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 441 Tobin Hall, 135 Hicks Way, 01003, Amherst, MA, USA su: Learning Memory Psychology Task performance Cognitive testing Mathematical models Research evaluation Prompts (Psychology) sug: subj: Learning Memory Psychology Task performance Cognitive testing Mathematical models Research evaluation Prompts (Psychology) keyword: Cognitive modeling Cued recall Episodic memory Retrieval practice Cognitive modeling Cued recall Episodic memory Retrieval practice ab: The primary and convergent retrieval (PCR) model assumes that the act of successful recall not only boosts associations between the item and retrieval cues but additionally strengthens associations within the item (i.e., between the features of an item), speeding the rate of information retrieval from memory. The latter effect is termed intra-item learning and is a unique benefit of recall practice (i.e., the "testing effect"). Prior work confirmed the prediction that recall practice produces faster subsequent recall than restudy practice even if accuracy is higher following restudy. The current study replicated this result, but also examined the downside of recall practice: that after a failure to recall during practice, participants will be faster in their failure to recall on a subsequent recall test. This prediction was confirmed in a multisession cued recall experiment that collected accuracy and recall latency measurements for no practice, recall practice, or restudy, with an immediate or delayed final test. The linear ballistic accumulator model was fit to latency distributions, and model comparison determined that these effects reflect differences in drift rates, as predicted by the PCR model. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|