| Sumario: | The theoretical relationships that have been produced around disciplines such as sociology, psychoanalysis and urban anthropology have been insisting on the processes of accumulation and reorganization that capital imposes on the territory from the grouping and homogenization of architectural forms and hierarchies functional, with its direct consequence in the conformation of territories as processes of subjectivation. Taking into account the contributions that psychoanalysis establishes with the concept of ontological vacuum--as symbolic availability not yet captured by capital--, it is proposed to discuss the condition of the subject in a new phase of his relationship with others starting from exceptional location of linguistic structures in the urban space: the Common.
|
|---|