Language and Thought in Hildegard of Bingen's Visionary Trilogy: Close and Distant Readings of a Thinker's Development.
By combining the methods of distant reading (computational stylistics) and close reading, the authors discuss the development of language and thought in Hildegard of Bingen's visionary works (Sciuias, Liber uite meritorum and Liber diuinorum operum). The visionary trilogy, although written over the...
| Publicado en: | Parergon Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 31 - 61 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=136580190&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 136580190 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03136221 65HN jtl: Parergon issn: 03136221 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2019 vid: 36 iid: 1 pid: 43679 pub: Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies artinfo: ui: 136580190 10.1353/pgn.2019.0001 ppf: 31 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 810KB tig: atl: Language and Thought in Hildegard of Bingen's Visionary Trilogy: Close and Distant Readings of a Thinker's Development. aug: au: Gussem, Jeroen De Wouters, Dinah affil: Ghent University su: Hildegard, Saint, 1098-1179 Theology sug: subj: Hildegard, Saint, 1098-1179 Theology ab: By combining the methods of distant reading (computational stylistics) and close reading, the authors discuss the development of language and thought in Hildegard of Bingen's visionary works (Sciuias, Liber uite meritorum and Liber diuinorum operum). The visionary trilogy, although written over the course of three decades, raises the impression of a monolithic and seemingly unchanging voice. Moving beyond this impression, the interdisciplinary analysis presented here reveals that the trilogy exhibits interesting differences at the word level which cannot simply be explained through external historical circumstances (e.g. manuscript transmission or different secretaries). Instead, the results raise pertinent questions regarding the trilogy's internal development in didactic method, style, and philosophy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Parergon is the property of Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Parergon holder: Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|