A New Interpretation of Carnap's Logical Pluralism.
Rudolf Carnap's logical pluralism is often held to be one in which corresponding connectives in different logics have different meanings. This paper presents an alternative view of Carnap's position, in which connectives can and do share their meaning in some (though not all) contexts. This re-inter...
| Publicado en: | Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 305 - 315 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=136648670&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 136648670 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01677411 NM2 jtl: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy issn: 01677411 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2019 vid: 38 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 136648670 10.1007/s11245-016-9423-y ppf: 305 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 374KB tig: atl: A New Interpretation of Carnap's Logical Pluralism. aug: au: Kouri, Teresa affil: University Hall, 230 N Oval Mall, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA su: Slogans Pluralism Language awareness Language & languages Translating & interpreting sug: subj: Slogans Pluralism Language awareness Language & languages Translating & interpreting keyword: Carnap Logical pluralism Stewart Shapiro Translation ab: Rudolf Carnap's logical pluralism is often held to be one in which corresponding connectives in different logics have different meanings. This paper presents an alternative view of Carnap's position, in which connectives can and do share their meaning in some (though not all) contexts. This re-interpretation depends crucially on extending Carnap's linguistic framework system to include meta-linguistic frameworks, those frameworks which we use to talk about linguistic frameworks. I provide an example that shows how this is possible, and give some textual evidence that Carnap would agree with this interpretation. Additionally, I show how this interpretation puts the Carnapian position much more in line with the position given in Shapiro (Varieties of Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014) than had been thought before. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2019. All Rights Reserved. item: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|