Quality evaluation of the emergency program of three contemporary cell-washing machines.
This study evaluates the efficiency of emergency programs used by three contemporary cell washers. Both time necessary to process a given amount of blood and quality of the processed blood are investigated. The Fresenius Kabi Smart, Haemonetics Elite and LivaNova Xtra were validated using bovine blo...
| Publicado en: | Perfusion Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 318 - 323 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications, Ltd.
May2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=136799499&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 136799499 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02676591 31J jtl: Perfusion issn: 02676591 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2019 vid: 34 iid: 4 pid: 33180 pub: Sage Publications, Ltd. place: <Blank> artinfo: ui: 136799499 136799499 136799499 10.1177/0267659118819927 136799499 ppf: 318 ppct: 5 formats: tig: atl: Quality evaluation of the emergency program of three contemporary cell-washing machines. aug: au: De Somer, Filip Bernolet, Hendrik Bouchez, Stefaan Bové, Thierry affil: Laboratory for Experimental Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium sug: subj: Cell Separation Equipment and Supplies Blood Transfusion, Autologous Equipment and Supplies Time Factors Software Evaluation Product Evaluation Equipment Design Calibration Evaluation Descriptive Statistics Kruskal-Wallis Test One-Way Analysis of Variance Data Analysis Software Centrifugation ab: This study evaluates the efficiency of emergency programs used by three contemporary cell washers. Both time necessary to process a given amount of blood and quality of the processed blood are investigated. The Fresenius Kabi Smart, Haemonetics Elite and LivaNova Xtra were validated using bovine blood, with a starting hematocrit of 13% or 21%. For all devices, the pre-programmed emergency program was used. The total volume processed in the 13% hematocrit group was 358 ± 68 mL for Fresenius, 375 ± 308 mL for Haemonetics and 497 ± 87 mL for LivaNova. In the 21% hematocrit group, the volumes were 533 ± 60 mL, 713 ± 142 mL and 798 ± 96 mL, respectively, showing a statistical difference between the Fresenius and LivaNova (p = 0.02). In the 13% hematocrit group, the Fresenius processed 45 ± 15 mL blood/min, the Haemonetics 62 ± 8 mL blood/min and the LivaNova 66 ± 1.5 mL blood/min. The difference between the Fresenius and LivaNova was statistically significant (p = 0.04). In the 21% hematocrit group, the processing speed was 69 ± 4 mL blood/min, 62 ± 8 mL blood/min and 77 ± 5 mL blood/min for the Fresenius, LivaNova and Haemonetics, respectively (p = 0.25). No major differences in the elimination of potassium, albumin and total protein or in hemolytic index were observed. No major differences were observed between discontinuous and continuous systems with respect to processing speed and wash quality with a starting hematocrit of 21%. Minor differences in processing speed were observed with a starting hematocrit of 13%. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|