A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.

Objectives: Radiologists' visual assessment of breast mammographic density (BMD) is subject to inter-observer variability. We aimed to develop and validate a new automated software tool mimicking expert radiologists' consensus assessments of 2D BMD, as per BI-RADS V recommendations.Methods: The soft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 29; no. 7; pp. 3830 - 3839
Autores principales: Balleyguier, Corinne, Arfi-Rouche, Julia, Boyer, Bruno, Gauthier, Emilien, Helin, Valerie, Loshkajian, Ara, Ragusa, Stephane, Delaloge, Suzette
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=136842401&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 136842401
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2019
      vid: 29
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        136842401
        136842401
        NLM30770972
        136842401
        10.1007/s00330-019-06016-y
        NLM30770972
        136842401
      ppf: 3830
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
      aug:
        au:
          Balleyguier, Corinne
          Arfi-Rouche, Julia
          Boyer, Bruno
          Gauthier, Emilien
          Helin, Valerie
          Loshkajian, Ara
          Ragusa, Stephane
          Delaloge, Suzette
        affil: Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
      sug:
        subj:
          Mammography Methods
          Breast Neoplasms Pathology
          Reproducibility of Results
          Aged
          Algorithms
          Resource Databases
          Adult
          Software
          Human
          Middle Age
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Breast Neoplasms
          Female
          Observer Bias
          Risk Assessment
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Barthel Index
          Psychological Tests
          Scales
          Aged: 65+ years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Female
      ab: Objectives: Radiologists' visual assessment of breast mammographic density (BMD) is subject to inter-observer variability. We aimed to develop and validate a new automated software tool mimicking expert radiologists' consensus assessments of 2D BMD, as per BI-RADS V recommendations.Methods: The software algorithm was developed using a concept of Manhattan distance to compare a patient's mammographic image to reference mammograms with an assigned BMD category. Reference databases were built from a total of 2289 pairs (cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique views) of 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Each image was independently assessed for BMD by a consensus of radiologists specialized in breast imaging. A validation set of additional 800 image pairs was evaluated for BMD both by the software and seven blinded radiologists specialized in breast imaging. The median score was used for consensus. Software reproducibility was assessed using FFDM image pairs from 214 patients in the validation set to compare BMD assessment between left and right breasts.Results: The software showed a substantial agreement with the radiologists' consensus (unweighted κ = 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.72) when considering the four breast density categories, and an almost perfect agreement (unweighted κ = 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88) when considering clinically significant non-dense (A-B) and dense (C-D) categories. Correlation between left and right breasts was high (rs = 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.90).Conclusions: BMD assessment by the software was strongly correlated to radiologists' consensus assessments of BMD. Its performance should be compared to other methods, and its clinical utility evaluated in a risk assessment model.Key Points: • A new software tool assesses breast density in a standardized way. • The tool mimics radiologists' clinical assessment of breast density. • It may be incorporated in a breast cancer risk assessment model.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N