Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method: Si...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Audiology Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 322 - 333 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Jun2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=136938084&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 136938084 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10590889 5KS jtl: American Journal of Audiology issn: 10590889 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2019 vid: 28 iid: 2 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association place: Rockville, Maryland artinfo: ui: 136938084 136938084 136938084 10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0117 136938084 ppf: 322 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity. aug: au: Weaver, Aurora J. DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J. Ries, Dennis T. affil: Auditory Psychophysics and Signal Processing Lab, Division of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Athens sug: subj: Pitch Perception Evaluation Clinical Assessment Tools Task Performance and Analysis Psychoacoustics Methods Auditory Perception Human Child Adult Descriptive Statistics Coefficient alpha Socioeconomic Factors Male Female Adolescence Ohio Two-Way Analysis of Variance Multiple Linear Regression Post Hoc Analysis Relative Risk Child: 6-12 years Adult: 19-44 years Adolescent: 13-18 years Male Female ab: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method: Sixty-six individuals, young children (ages 10-- 12 years, n = 22), older children (ages 13--15 years, n = 23), and adults (ages 18--33 years, n = 21), were recruited and assigned to subgroups based on reported duration (years) of instrumental music instruction. Additional background information was collected in order to assess if the pitch temporal processing and patterning span developed, the Pspan, was sensitive to individual differences across participants. Results: The evaluation of the Pspan task as a scale indicated good parallel reliability across runs assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and scores were normally distributed. Between- subjects analysis of variance indicated main effects for both age groups and music groups recruited for the study. A multiple regression analysis with the Pspan scores as the dependent variable found that 3 measures of music instruction, age in years, and paternal education were predictive of enhanced temporal processing and patterning capacity for pitch input. Conclusions: The outcomes suggest that the Pspan task is a time-efficient data collection tool that is sensitive to the duration of instrumental music instruction, maturation, and paternal education. In addition, results indicate that the task is sensitive to age-related auditory temporal processing and patterning performance changes during adolescence when children are 10--15 years old. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|