Monitoring Hearing in an Infectious Disease Clinic with mHealth Technologies.

Background: Decentralized detection and monitoring of hearing loss can be supported by new mobile health technologies using automated testing that can be facilitated by minimally trained persons. These may prove particularly useful in an infectious disease (ID) clinic setting where the risk of heari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Vol. 30; no. 6; pp. 482 - 493
Autores principales: Brittz, Marize, Heinze, Barbara, Mahomed-Asmail, Faheema, Swanepoel, De Wet, Stoltz, Anton
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. Jun2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137080322&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 137080322
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10500545
        9OC
      jtl: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
      issn: 10500545
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2019
      vid: 30
      iid: 6
      pid: 2811
      pub: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137080322
        137080322
        137080322
        10.3766/jaaa.17120
        137080322
      ppf: 482
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Monitoring Hearing in an Infectious Disease Clinic with mHealth Technologies.
      aug:
        au:
          Brittz, Marize
          Heinze, Barbara
          Mahomed-Asmail, Faheema
          Swanepoel, De Wet
          Stoltz, Anton
        affil: Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
      sug:
        subj:
          Telehealth
          Hearing Disorders
          Audiometry Methods
          Smartphone Utilization
          Human
          Technology
          Male
          Female
          Mobile Applications
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Audiometry, Pure-Tone
          South Africa
          HIV Infections
          Power Analysis
          Otoscopy
          Acoustic Impedance Tests
          Data Analysis Software
          Auditory Threshold
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Decentralized detection and monitoring of hearing loss can be supported by new mobile health technologies using automated testing that can be facilitated by minimally trained persons. These may prove particularly useful in an infectious disease (ID) clinic setting where the risk of hearing loss is high. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical utility of mobile and automated audiometry hearing health technology in an ID clinic setting. Research Design: Smartphone-automated pure-tone audiometry (PTA) (hearTest™) and speech-in-noise testing (SA English digits-in-noise [DIN] test) were compared with manual audiometry (2, 4, and 8 kHz). Smartphone-automated PTA and the DIN test were repeated to determine the test-retest reliability. Study Sample: Two hundred subjects (73% female and 27% male) were enrolled. Fifty participants were retested with the smartphone applications. Participants ranged from an age of 18 to 55 years with a mean age of 44.4 (8.7 standard deviation). Data Analysis: Threshold comparisons were made between smartphone audiometry testing and manual audiometry. Smartphone-automated PTA, manual audiometry, and test-retest measures were compared (Wilcoxon signed ranked test). Spearman rank correlation test was used to determine the relationship between the smartphone applications and manual audiometry, as well as for test-retest reliability. Results: Within all participants, 88.2% of thresholds corresponded within 10 dB or less between smartphone audiometry and manual audiometry. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the right ear at 4 and 8 kHz and in the left ear at 2 and 4 kHz between smartphone and manual audiometry, respectively. No significant difference was noted (p < 0.05) between test and retest measures of smartphone technology. Conclusions: Smartphone audiometry with calibrated headphones provides reliable results in an ID clinic setting and can be used as a baseline and monitoring tool at ID clinics.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N