Multicentre experience with the second‐generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and the intermuscular two‐incision implantation technique.

Introduction: The recently developed second‐generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) and the intermuscular two‐incision implantation technique demonstrate potential favorable features that reduce inappropriate shocks and complications. However, data concerning large pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 30; no. 6; pp. 854 - 865
Autores principales: Migliore, Federico, Mattesi, Giulia, Franceschi, Pietro, Allocca, Giuseppe, Crosato, Martino, Calzolari, Vittorio, Fantinel, Mauro, Ortis, Benedetta, Facchin, Domenico, Daleffe, Elisabetta, Fabris, Tommaso, Marras, Elena, Lazzari, Manuel, Zanon, Francesco, Marcantoni, Lina, Siciliano, Mariachiara, Corrado, Domenico, Iliceto, Sabino, Bertaglia, Emanuele, Zecchin, Massimo
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts tracings Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137145513&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 137145513
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2019
      vid: 30
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137145513
        137145513
        137145513
        10.1111/jce.13894
        137145513
      ppf: 854
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Multicentre experience with the second‐generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and the intermuscular two‐incision implantation technique.
      aug:
        au:
          Migliore, Federico
          Mattesi, Giulia
          Franceschi, Pietro
          Allocca, Giuseppe
          Crosato, Martino
          Calzolari, Vittorio
          Fantinel, Mauro
          Ortis, Benedetta
          Facchin, Domenico
          Daleffe, Elisabetta
          Fabris, Tommaso
          Marras, Elena
          Lazzari, Manuel
          Zanon, Francesco
          Marcantoni, Lina
          Siciliano, Mariachiara
          Corrado, Domenico
          Iliceto, Sabino
          Bertaglia, Emanuele
          Zecchin, Massimo
        affil: Department of Cardiac, Thoracic And Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Defibrillators, Implantable Methods
          Tachycardia, Ventricular Surgery
          Patient Safety
          Human
          Multicenter Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Treatment Outcomes
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Defibrillators, Implantable Adverse Effects
          Shock, Surgical Etiology
          Postoperative Complications Risk Factors
          Postoperative Complications Prevention and Control
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: The recently developed second‐generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) and the intermuscular two‐incision implantation technique demonstrate potential favorable features that reduce inappropriate shocks and complications. However, data concerning large patient populations are lacking. The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to evaluate the safety and outcome of second‐generation S‐ICD using the intermuscular two‐incision technique in a large population study. Methods and Results: The study population included 101 consecutive patients (75% male; mean age, 45 ± 13 years) who received second‐generation S‐ICD (EMBLEM; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) implantation using the intermuscular two‐incision technique as an alternative to the standard implantation technique. Twenty nine (29%) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. Twenty four (24%) patients had a previously implanted transvenous ICD. All patients were implanted without any procedure‐related complications. Defibrillation testing was performed in 80 (79%) patients, and ventricular tachycardia was successfully converted at less than or equal to 65 J in 98.75% (79/80) of patients without pulse generator adjustments. During a median follow‐up of 21 ± 10 months, no complications requiring surgical revision or local or systemic device‐related infections were observed. Ten patients (9.9%) received appropriate and successful shocks for ventricular arrhythmias. Three (2.9%) patients experienced inappropriate shocks due to oversensing the cardiac signal (n = 1), noncardiac signal (n = 1), and a combination of both cardiac and noncardiac signals (n = 1), with one patient requiring device explantation. No patients required device explantation due to antitachycardia pacing indications. Conclusions: According to our multicentre study, second‐generation S‐ICD implanted with the intermuscular two‐incision technique is an available safe combination and appears to be associated with a low risk of complications, such as inappropriate shocks.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        tracings
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N