Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications.

It is commonly hypothesized that scientists are more likely to engage in data falsification and fabrication when they are subject to pressures to publish, when they are not restrained by forms of social control, when they work in countries lacking policies to tackle scientific misconduct, and when t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details

Published in:	Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 771 - 790
Main Authors:	Fanelli, Daniele, Costas, Rodrigo, Fang, Ferric C., Casadevall, Arturo, Bik, Elisabeth M.
Format:	Article
Published:	Springer Nature Jun2019
Subjects:	Fraud in science Falsification of data Disease risk factors Hypothesis Social control Nanofabrication
Online Access:	View this record in EBSCOhost