Multiclass Benchmarking Framework for Automated Acute Leukaemia Detection and Classification Based on BWM and Group-VIKOR.
This paper aims to assist the administration departments of medical organisations in making the right decision on selecting a suitable multiclass classification model for acute leukaemia. In this paper, we proposed a framework that will aid these departments in evaluating, benchmarking and ranking a...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Medical Systems Vol. 43; no. 7 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jul2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137182943&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 137182943 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01485598 4N0 jtl: Journal of Medical Systems issn: 01485598 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2019 vid: 43 iid: 7 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 137182943 137182943 137182943 10.1007/s10916-019-1338-x 137182943 ppct: 1 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Multiclass Benchmarking Framework for Automated Acute Leukaemia Detection and Classification Based on BWM and Group-VIKOR. aug: au: Alsalem, M. A. Zaidan, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Albahri, O. S. Alamoodi, A. H. Albahri, A. S. Mohsin, A. H. Mohammed, K. I. affil: Department of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia sug: subj: Health Facility Administration Leukemia Diagnosis Leukemia Classification Decision Making, Computer Assisted Methods Benchmarking Models, Theoretical Medical Informatics Automation Leukemia Blood Microscopy Methods Machine Learning Algorithms Utilization Decision Trees Validity ab: This paper aims to assist the administration departments of medical organisations in making the right decision on selecting a suitable multiclass classification model for acute leukaemia. In this paper, we proposed a framework that will aid these departments in evaluating, benchmarking and ranking available multiclass classification models for the selection of the best one. Medical organisations have continuously faced evaluation and benchmarking challenges in such endeavour, especially when no single model is superior. Moreover, the improper selection of multiclass classification for acute leukaemia model may be costly for medical organisations. For example, when a patient dies, one such organisation will be legally or financially sued for incidents in which the model fails to fulfil its desired outcome. With regard to evaluation and benchmarking, multiclass classification models are challenging processes due to multiple evaluation and conflicting criteria. This study structured a decision matrix (DM) based on the crossover of 2 groups of multi-evaluation criteria and 22 multiclass classification models. The matrix was then evaluated with datasets comprising 72 samples of acute leukaemia, which include 5327 gens. Subsequently, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques are used in the benchmarking and ranking of multiclass classification models. The MCDM used techniques that include the integrated BWM and VIKOR. BWM has been applied for the weight calculations of evaluation criteria, whereas VIKOR has been used to benchmark and rank classification models. VIKOR has also been employed in two decision-making contexts: individual and group decision making and internal and external group aggregation. Results showed the following: (1) the integration of BWM and VIKOR is effective at solving the benchmarking/selection problems of multiclass classification models. (2) The ranks of classification models obtained from internal and external VIKOR group decision making were almost the same, and the best multiclass classification model based on the two was 'Bayes. Naive Byes Updateable' and the worst one was 'Trees.LMT'. (3) Among the scores of groups in the objective validation, significant differences were identified, which indicated that the ranking results of internal and external VIKOR group decision making were valid. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|