Deep Learning versus Conventional Machine Learning for Detection of Healthcare-Associated Infections in French Clinical Narratives.
Objective: The objective of this article was to compare the performances of health care-associated infection (HAI) detection between deep learning and conventional machine learning (ML) methods in French medical reports.Methods: The corpus consisted in different types of medical reports (discharge s...
| Publicado en: | Methods of Information in Medicine Vol. 58; no. 1; pp. 31 - 42 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishing Inc.
2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137345261&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 137345261 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00261270 W7M jtl: Methods of Information in Medicine issn: 00261270 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2019 vid: 58 iid: 1 pid: 2811 pub: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 137345261 137345261 NLM30877683 10.1055/s-0039-1677692 NLM30877683 137345261 ppf: 31 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Deep Learning versus Conventional Machine Learning for Detection of Healthcare-Associated Infections in French Clinical Narratives. aug: au: Rabhi, Sara Jakubowicz, Jérémie Metzger, Marie-Helene affil: Telecom SudParis, Institut Mines-Telecom, Paris, Île-de-France, France sug: ab: Objective: The objective of this article was to compare the performances of health care-associated infection (HAI) detection between deep learning and conventional machine learning (ML) methods in French medical reports.Methods: The corpus consisted in different types of medical reports (discharge summaries, surgery reports, consultation reports, etc.). A total of 1,531 medical text documents were extracted and deidentified in three French university hospitals. Each of them was labeled as presence (1) or absence (0) of HAI. We started by normalizing the records using a list of preprocessing techniques. We calculated an overall performance metric, the F1 Score, to compare a deep learning method (convolutional neural network [CNN]) with the most popular conventional ML models (Bernoulli and multi-naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, random forests, extra-trees, gradient boosting, support vector machines). We applied the hyperparameter Bayesian optimization for each model based on its HAI identification performances. We included the set of text representation as an additional hyperparameter for each model, using four different text representations (bag of words, term frequency-inverse document frequency, word2vec, and Glove).Results: CNN outperforms all other conventional ML algorithms for HAI classification. The best F1 Score of 97.7% ± 3.6% and best area under the curve score of 99.8% ± 0.41% were achieved when CNN was directly applied to the processed clinical notes without a pretrained word2vec embedding. Through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we could achieve a good balance between false notifications (with a specificity equal to 0.937) and system detection capability (with a sensitivity equal to 0.962) using the Youden's index reference.Conclusions: The main drawback of CNNs is their opacity. To address this issue, we investigated CNN inner layers' activation values to visualize the most meaningful phrases in a document. This method could be used to build a phrase-based medical assistant algorithm to help the infection control practitioner to select relevant medical records. Our study demonstrated that deep learning approach outperforms other classification learning algorithms for automatically identifying HAIs in medical reports. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|