Roles and relationships: On whether social roles ground associative reasons.

A common theory of associative reasons is that they attach to a social role, and when an individual identifies with that role, she acquires the attached reasons. I argue that associative reasons are different in kind from those provided by social roles. Social roles are self‐referential rather than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 377 - 387
Autor principal: Brewer‐Davis, Nina
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=137436622&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 137436622
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2019
      vid: 27
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137436622
        10.1111/ejop.12401
      ppf: 377
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 300KB
      tig:
        atl: Roles and relationships: On whether social roles ground associative reasons.
      aug:
        au: Brewer‐Davis, Nina
        affil: Philosophy Department, Dominican University, River Forest Illinois, USA
      su:
        Social role
        Social belonging
        Psychology
        Social participation
        Interpersonal relations
      sug:
        subj:
          Social role
          Social belonging
          Psychology
          Social participation
          Interpersonal relations
      ab: A common theory of associative reasons is that they attach to a social role, and when an individual identifies with that role, she acquires the attached reasons. I argue that associative reasons are different in kind from those provided by social roles. Social roles are self‐referential rather than interpersonal. That is, role reasons apply to someone depending on whether or how the individual inhabits her role, rather than whether or how she participates in a relationship with another individual. A justification of associative reasons should start from a theory of relationships' normative significance, such as its shared history. Finally, I give a brief account of the normative significance of shared history, psychological connectedness. Shared history matters in virtue of the connectedness it produces between people.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N