Who Sets the Rules? Institutional Misfits and Bricolage in Hunting Management in Brazil.
Hunting management in Brazil in not regulated by a unique legal framework, but by a combination of national environmental legislation and local rules and norms. Therefore, a multidimensional perspective combining structural and procedural analysis of the different institutional arrangements is neces...
| Publicado en: | Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal Vol. 47; no. 3; pp. 369 - 381 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=137558813&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 137558813 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03007839 HUE jtl: Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal issn: 03007839 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2019 vid: 47 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 137558813 10.1007/s10745-019-00080-0 ppf: 369 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: Who Sets the Rules? Institutional Misfits and Bricolage in Hunting Management in Brazil. aug: au: de Mattos Vieira, Marina A. R. de Castro, Fábio Shepard, Glenn Harvey affil: Instituto Socioambiental, Boa Vista, RR, Brazil RedeFauna, Rede de Pesquisa em Diversidade, Conservação e Uso da Fauna na Amazônia, Amazonas, Brazil CEDLA, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Departamento de Antropologia, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, PA, Brazil su: Brazil Amazon River Region Sustainable development Natural resources management Linear complementarity problem sug: subj: Sustainable development Brazil Amazon River Region Administration of General Economic Programs Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs Natural resources management Linear complementarity problem keyword: Brazilian Amazon Hunting management Institutional arrangement Meta-governance Piagaçu-Purus Sustainable Development Reserve Brazilian Amazon Hunting management Institutional arrangement Meta-governance Piagaçu-Purus Sustainable Development Reserve ab: Hunting management in Brazil in not regulated by a unique legal framework, but by a combination of national environmental legislation and local rules and norms. Therefore, a multidimensional perspective combining structural and procedural analysis of the different institutional arrangements is necessary for better understanding of this local natural resource management system. We combined three analytical approaches in the study case of hunting management in the Piagaçu-Purus Sustainable Development Reserve (RDS-PP) in the Brazilian Amazon. The institutional analysis of the rules revealed gaps and inconsistencies between different structures and decision levels. The meta-governance analysis indicated incongruities arising from different perceptions and values among stakeholders. Finally, the bricolage analysis revealed hybrid strategies used by local stakeholders and state agents. We conclude that complementarity of analytical frameworks is necessary in order to understand how multiple perceptions and power asymmetries in co-management arenas may influence the dynamics and porosity of such institutional arrangements. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|