SCIENTIFIC REALISM AND THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE.

Nickles raises many original objections against scientific realism. One of them holds that scientific realism originates from the end of history illusion. I reply that this objection is self-defeating and commits the genetic fallacy. Another objection is that it is unknowable whether our descendants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy no. 60; pp. 61 - 72
Autor principal: Park, Seungbae
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=137657799&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 137657799
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17335566
        77X1
      jtl: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 17335566
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2019
      iid: 60
      pid: 49926
      pub: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137657799
        10.33392/diam.1119
      ppf: 61
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 814KB
      tig:
        atl: SCIENTIFIC REALISM AND THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE.
      aug:
        au: Park, Seungbae
        affil: Division of General Studies Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Ulsan, Ulju-gun 689-798 Republic of Korea
      su:
        Realism
        Scientific development
        Thought & thinking
      sug:
        subj:
          Realism
          Scientific development
          Thought & thinking
      keyword:
        end of history illusion
        mature theories
        pessimistic induction
        scientific realism
      ab: Nickles raises many original objections against scientific realism. One of them holds that scientific realism originates from the end of history illusion. I reply that this objection is self-defeating and commits the genetic fallacy. Another objection is that it is unknowable whether our descendants will regard our current mature theories as true or false. I reply that this objection entails skepticism about induction, leading to skepticism about the world, which is inconsistent with the appeal to the end of history illusion. Finally, I argue that we have an inductive rationale for thinking that will lead our descendants to regard our current mature theories as true.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy is the property of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N