THE UNDENIABLE OTHER.

The efforts to explain the other constantly fail. The creation of images reveals the presence of the other who appears both as an excess of any explanation and as a condition for the understanding of the diversity of such images. Even in its denial, such presence demands a dialogical dimension which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) no. 99; pp. 20 - 30
Autor principal: MICKUNAS, ALGIS
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Logos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=137685578&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 137685578
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08687692
        8XKW
      jtl: Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692)
      issn: 08687692
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2019
      iid: 99
      pid: 53094
      pub: Logos
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137685578
        10.24101/logos.2019.26
      ppf: 20
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.4MB
      tig:
        atl: THE UNDENIABLE OTHER.
      aug:
        au: MICKUNAS, ALGIS
        affil: Ohajo universitetas, JAV
      su:
        Materialism
        Scientism
        Western civilization
        Christianity
        Greece
      sug:
        subj:
          Greece
          Materialism
          Scientism
          Western civilization
          Christianity
      keyword:
        Ancient Greece
        dialogical tradition
        dialoginė tradicija
        identity
        kitas
        krikščionybė
        monological tradition
        monologinė tradicija
        Senovės Graikija
        tapatumas
        the other
        dialoginė tradicija
        kitas
        krikščionybė
        monologinė tradicija
        Senovės Graikija
        tapatumas
      ab:
        The efforts to explain the other constantly fail. The creation of images reveals the presence of the other who appears both as an excess of any explanation and as a condition for the understanding of the diversity of such images. Even in its denial, such presence demands a dialogical dimension which includes both the explainer and the other. The birth of Western civilization, in its Socratic mode, was profoundly dialogical. Various trends, such as scientism and theology, shifted discourse to monological doctrines. Regardless of the kind of monologue, each claimed to subsume the other in its own logic, depriving the other of equal voice. Yet what is significant is that such a voice was always present - even in its denial. Good examples come from cultural conquests, racisms and colonialisms. Yet the most pronounced monological logic is scientific reductionism to a single ontological base: the fragmenting logic of materialism.
        Visos pastangos paaiškinti kitą nuolat nueina perniek. Bet koks bandymas sukurti išbaigtą kito įvaizdį atskleidžia tik tai, kad tas kitas pasirodo esąs daugiau, nei bet koks įvaizdis ar paaiškinimas gali aprėpti. Tokios aplinkybės, net ir kito neigimo atveju, reikalauja dialogiško santykio, apimančio tiek aiškintoją, tiek ir kitą. Sokratiškoji Vakarų civilizacijos pradžia buvo giliai dialogiška, tačiau tokios tendencijos, pavydžiui, kaip mokslai ar teologija, pasuko šią kultūrą monologiškų doktrinų link. Nepriklausomai nuo monologiškumo rūšies, kiekviena doktrina tvirtina apimanti kitą savąja logika, savo ruožtu atimdama iš to kito lygiavertį balsą. Vis dėlto tokie kultūrų užkariavimo pavyzdžiai kaip rasizmas ar kolonializmas atskleidžia, kad kito balsas niekur nedingsta, net jei jis ir paneigiamas. Tačiau pačią ryškiausią monologišką logiką atskleidžia mokslinis redukcionizmas, kuris viską suprastina į vieną ontologinį pagrindą - fragmentuojančią materializmo logiką.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692)
      holder: Logos
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N